Closed
Bug 293856
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
li contents do not flow under a float
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Floats, defect)
Core
Layout: Floats
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 143162
People
(Reporter: alexandre.rossi, Unassigned)
Details
(Keywords: testcase)
Attachments
(3 files)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr-FR; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0.4
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr-FR; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0.4
If you have very big li elements, and a float right on top of those, the li sets
its width so as not to overlap the float.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Visit the testcase
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15" />
<title>Flowing on big li</title>
<style type="text/css" media="screen">
#container { width:400px; color:white; }
.main { background-color:green; }
.floating { float:right; width:200px; background-color:blue; margin:5px; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="container">
<div class="floating">
Look! The contents of the list DO NOT flow below me with the Gecko rendering
engine. Is this a bug?
</div>
<div class="main">
<ul>
<li>Hi, I am a list with very very long <code>li</code> elements. I can be the
contents of a news log, or I don't know, anything else. A list of really long
elements. This is really a matter of choice. Some weblogs use a list to let
posts flow, and some others use <code>div</code>s. Perhaps it is a bad idea
anyway to use a list.</li>
<li>And I am the next post. I have no problem at all to flow below the float.</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Actual Results:
The width of the li element is automatically set not to overlap the float.
Expected Results:
The li elements should be behind the float, and its contents should flow around
the float.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 143162 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•