Closed
Bug 294610
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
fastback/bfcache remembers DOM state after event processing on page quit
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Navigation, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: Athropos, Assigned: bryner)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 obsolete file)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050515 Firefox/1.0+ Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050515 Firefox/1.0+ See steps to reproduce. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to the given URL 2. Perform a search on the term 'video' 3. When the results are displayed, hit the back button Actual Results: The button 'Valider' has disappeared. Expected Results: It should not.
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
This code gets executed when submitting the form: onclick="document.form1.Valider.style.visibility='hidden';" Hm...looks like it's doing this so you don't submit twice when the results page takes a bit longer to load. Opera has the same problem here.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
You are right, so my title for this bug is not correct but I don't know which one would suit the best. If the goal of the new "Instant Back/Forward" feature is to display the page exactly as it was when the user left it, then this should perhaps not be considered as a bug...
Updated•19 years ago
|
Summary: Instant Back/Forward make some forms elements disappear → fastback/bfcache remembers DOM state after event processing on page quit
Updated•19 years ago
|
Blocks: blazinglyfastback
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
FWIW, the button doesn't show in opera8 either after going back. (But it does show in ff with fasback disabled.)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
The behavior is by design, however, I suspect in browsers such as IE, the DOM is not cached because of one of: <meta http-equiv="Pragma" content="no-cache" /> <meta http-equiv="Cache-Control" content="no-cache, must-revalidate" /> I'm wondering if we should try to emulate IE a bit more closely for compatibility here.
Assignee: nobody → bryner
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
I had to add the mDocument member because some callsites first calls Destroy() on the contentviewer before calling SetContentViewer(nsnull) on the SHEntry. In that case we wouldn't be able to get to the document to remove ourselvs as observer causing the document to have a dangling pointer once the SHEntry goes away. The PLEvent fixes two problems. First of all we don't want to risk dropping the last reference to the contentviewer during mutation causing the contentviewer and document to die. Second, calling Destroy on the viewer during mutation seemed to remove some other documentobservers (probably the presshell). The notification code can't deal with observers other then the current one being removed during notification.
Assignee: bryner → bugmail
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #187178 -
Flags: superreview?(bryner)
Attachment #187178 -
Flags: review?(bryner)
Opps, previous comment was for bug 292962
Assignee: bugmail → bryner
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Attachment #187178 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #187178 -
Flags: superreview?(bryner)
Attachment #187178 -
Flags: review?(bryner)
I don't think this is a problem in IE because AFAICT they never cache the DOM. I'm not sure there is much we can do about this type of problem besides evangilizing. This is the same type of problem as we have with going back to a google search result.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•19 years ago
|
||
Ok, I think this is not a bug.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Component: History: Session → Document Navigation
QA Contact: history.session → docshell
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•