Closed
Bug 302321
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
css: padding-top change the position of background-image and background-position
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Images, Video, and HTML Frames, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: t-bird, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-DE; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0.4
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-DE; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0.4
First, sry for my bad english ...
In Firefox, the "padding-top" css-attribute changes the position of the
background-image. I think the image must be independent of padding-top.
The values of "background-position" will ignored.
Test this site (http://www.sparkasse-re.de/content/rlmmenu/rlmmenu.php) in
Firefox, Opera and IE, then you can see the problem.
Reproducible: Always
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
That page looks the same in all 3 browsers to me.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b4) Gecko/20050726
Firefox/1.0+ ID:2005072606
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
looks identical in firefox trunk 20050721 and Opera 8.01 on linux. I'm not sure
what you mean by your description, but check against
<http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/box.html#box-model>, e.g. "All borders are drawn on
top of the box's background."
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
The question is where the background position attribute should be relative to.
According to http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/colors.html#propdef-background-position
it should be relative to the boxes padding edge, not the content edge.
Reporter, can you clarify if what you are seeing is other than this and provide
a test case that demonstrates it?
You can see the difference here http://www.sparkasse-re.de/content/rlmmenu/demo.gif
Firefox on left, IE on right side
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
I fail to see what the difference in spacing that you're seeing has to do with
the background image position.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Component: General → Layout: Images
Product: Firefox → Core
Version: unspecified → 1.7 Branch
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
Daniel, can you please explain what the issue is here please.
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
No response, resolving INVALID.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Updated•7 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
Updated•7 years ago
|
Product: Core Graveyard → Core
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•