Closed Bug 30663 Opened 25 years ago Closed 25 years ago

reload button should defeat Cache-Control max-age

Categories

(Core :: Networking: Cache, defect, P3)

x86
Linux
defect

Tracking

()

VERIFIED FIXED

People

(Reporter: david+bugs, Assigned: gordon)

Details

From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; N; Linux 2.2.13-lazuli i686; en-US; m14) BuildID: 2000030312 If the server sends a Cache-Control: max-age= header, the document will be cached for this duration and not checked against the network even if the reload button is pressed. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Load a document on a site that will send an HTTP/1.1 Cache-Control: max-age= header. 2. Click on reload before the max-age is expired. 3. No network connection is made. Actual Results: Document is not reloaded. If it has been modified on the server, the old version is still seen. This has been experimentally verified against an Apache/1.3.9 server with a "Header set Cache-Control max-age=86400" directive. Expected Results: Mozilla should send an HTTP GET request with an If-Modified-Since header (as well as If-None-Match if possible). All this discussion is in the absence of proxies: only the server and the client are involved. The way I see it, the max-age value should only be used when following links and such; it should not override the effect of the reload button. Bugs 14772 discusses the HTTP caching mechanism further (but it is not identical to this one: it complains about Mozilla not caching enough whereas I complain about Mozilla caching too much). But 26638 is also related to this one (but it is also about Mozilla not caching enough).
david.madore@ens.fr - is this still the cache behaviour on a recent build? Gerv
I build from thursday on would be best since I modified a bunch of reload properties for back,forward, and reload. Thanks.
It is fixed on build 2000051210. Great!
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
verified by reporter
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.