Closed Bug 310291 Opened 19 years ago Closed 19 years ago

Sidebar max-width shouldn't be in px, consistency with the Go menu

Categories

(Firefox :: Disability Access, defect)

defect
Not set
minor

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
Firefox 2 alpha1

People

(Reporter: tbertels+bugzilla, Assigned: tbertels+bugzilla)

References

Details

(Keywords: access, fixed1.8.1)

Attachments

(1 file, 2 obsolete files)

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.8b4) Gecko/20050906 Firefox/1.4
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.8b4) Gecko/20050906 Firefox/1.4

The sidebar max-width is 400px, what means that users wich use large or very
large fonts won't be able to read the full titles of the bookmarks.
The Go menu max-width is set to 50em, so why not the same max-width for the
sidebar ?

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Keywords: access
Attached patch Sidebar max-width to 50em (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #197684 - Flags: review?(mconnor)
This is a very good idea. :)
Attachment #197684 - Flags: review?(mconnor) → review?(mconnor)
Comment on attachment 197684 [details] [diff] [review]
Sidebar max-width to 50em

If you're going to do one in em, convert all of them.  Also, what font size are
you using a base for the conversion?  We shouldn't change things if possible
for the default font size.
Attachment #197684 - Flags: review?(mconnor) → review-
Determined with default font size.
The 50em max-width is the same as the Go menu, it's also better when using
subfolders.
Attachment #197684 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #198294 - Flags: review?(mconnor)
Attached patch (max-width:36em)Splinter Review
This one keeps the same sizes as the ones in px, the max-width is perhaps too
narrow, especially for users of subfolders or who use high resolution screens.
Or would an horizontal scrollbar be better than max-width:50em?
Attachment #198295 - Flags: review?(mconnor)
Comment on attachment 198295 [details] [diff] [review]
(max-width:36em)

I think this is big enough.  I have a 1920x1200 monitor, and the existing sidebar is plenty big enough for sidebar-friendly content.
Attachment #198295 - Flags: review?(mconnor) → review+
Attachment #198294 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #198294 - Flags: review?(mconnor)
Attachment #198295 - Flags: ui-review?(beltzner)
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment on attachment 198295 [details] [diff] [review]
(max-width:36em)

Makes sense to me.
Attachment #198295 - Flags: ui-review?(beltzner) → ui-review+
Assignee: nobody → tbertels
Severity: normal → minor
OS: Windows XP → All
Hardware: PC → All
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 2 alpha1
Fixed on the trunk and 1.8 branch for Firefox 2.
mozilla/browser/base/content/browser.xul; new revision: 1.278;
mozilla/browser/base/content/browser.xul; new revision: 1.268.2.11;
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Keywords: fixed1.8.1
Resolution: --- → FIXED
See Also: → 1904210
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: