Closed
Bug 316504
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Crash on bad box element [@nsHTMLReflowState::CalculateHypotheticalBox]
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 253479
People
(Reporter: altape, Unassigned)
Details
(Keywords: crash, crashreportid, testcase)
Crash Data
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
168 bytes,
application/vnd.mozilla.xul+xml
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051107 Firefox/1.5
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051107 Firefox/1.5
An XUL box styled with "position:fixed; top:auto; bottom:auto;" crashes firefox.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Load any XUL file containing an XUL box as described above.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
Sounds like bug 253479, not?
Component: XP Toolkit/Widgets: XUL → Layout
QA Contact: xptoolkit.xul → layout
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
Attachment #203096 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2)
> Sounds like bug 253479, not?
>
That bug seems to only affect fixed non-xul elements. This affects an xul box when style is set to "position:fixed; top:auto;". (turns out adding bottom:auto isn't necessary to crash)
Keywords: crash
Comment 5•19 years ago
|
||
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20051112 SeaMonkey/1.5a Talkback ID: TB11885843E
OS: Linux → All
Keywords: talkbackid
Comment 6•19 years ago
|
||
TB11885843E Stack Signature nsHTMLReflowState::CalculateHypotheticalBox
similar stacktrace in Linux Bug 284228 comment1
Bug 284228 Crash with absolute positioning of link toolbar
TB11885843E:
nsHTMLReflowState::CalculateHypotheticalBox [c:/builds/tinderbox/MozillaTrunk/WINNT_5.0_Clobber/mozilla/layout/generic/nsHTMLReflowState.cpp, line 893]
nsHTMLReflowState::InitAbsoluteConstraints [c:/builds/tinderbox/MozillaTrunk/WINNT_5.0_Clobber/mozilla/layout/generic/nsHTMLReflowState.cpp, line 1067]
nsHTMLReflowState::InitConstraints [c:/builds/tinderbox/MozillaTrunk/WINNT_5.0_Clobber/mozilla/layout/generic/nsHTMLReflowState.cpp, line 1965]
nsHTMLReflowState::Init [c:/builds/tinderbox/MozillaTrunk/WINNT_5.0_Clobber/mozilla/layout/generic/nsHTMLReflowState.cpp, line 342]
nsHTMLReflowState::nsHTMLReflowState [c:/builds/tinderbox/MozillaTrunk/WINNT_5.0_Clobber/mozilla/layout/generic/nsHTMLReflowState.cpp, line 315]
nsAbsoluteContainingBlock::ReflowAbsoluteFrame [c:/builds/tinderbox/MozillaTrunk/WINNT_5.0_Clobber/mozilla/layout/generic/nsAbsoluteContainingBlock.cpp, line 521]
nsAbsoluteContainingBlock::Reflow [c:/builds/tinderbox/MozillaTrunk/WINNT_5.0_Clobber/mozilla/layout/generic/nsAbsoluteContainingBlock.cpp, line 208]
ViewportFrame::Reflow [c:/builds/tinderbox/MozillaTrunk/WINNT_5.0_Clobber/mozilla/layout/generic/nsViewportFrame.cpp, line 290]
PresShell::InitialReflow [c:/builds/tinderbox/MozillaTrunk/WINNT_5.0_Clobber/mozilla/layout/base/nsPresShell.cpp, line 2761]
nsXULDocument::StartLayout [c:/builds/tinderbox/MozillaTrunk/WINNT_5.0_Clobber/mozilla/content/xul/document/src/nsXULDocument.cpp, line 2059]
nsXULDocument::ResumeWalk [c:/builds/tinderbox/MozillaTrunk/WINNT_5.0_Clobber/mozilla/content/xul/document/src/nsXULDocument.cpp, line 3085]
nsXULDocument::EndLoad [c:/builds/tinderbox/MozillaTrunk/WINNT_5.0_Clobber/mozilla/content/xul/document/src/nsXULDocument.cpp, line 745]
XULContentSinkImpl::DidBuildModel [c:/builds/tinderbox/MozillaTrunk/WINNT_5.0_Clobber/mozilla/content/xul/document/src/nsXULContentSink.cpp, line 407]
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Summary: Crash on bad box element → Crash on bad box element [@nsHTMLReflowState::CalculateHypotheticalBox]
Updated•19 years ago
|
The summary of bug 253479 was not an accurate description of the conditions causing the crash. I've corrected it.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 253479 ***
No longer blocks: 317502
Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Crash Signature: [@nsHTMLReflowState::CalculateHypotheticalBox]
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•