Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060207 Firefox/1.6a1 1. New Profile, Homepage about:blank 2. Install Forecastfox v0.8.5 from https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?application=firefox&id=398 3. Restart firefox with logging 4. Observe that the Forecastfox Options dialog is being displayed. Enter a location to get weather for (eg: 60601). 5. Click OK. (Note: Forecast's weather status icons will appear in the bottom right of the browser) 6. Close Firefox. Analysis of nspr.log with leal-gauge.pl gives: Leaked 2 out of 6 DOM Windows Leaked 2 out of 30 documents Leaked 0 out of 3 docshells (Same for all subsequent starts of firefox with about:blank, close firefox, analyse log) If my memory serves me correctly, the version before this release did not used to leak.
Could someone test out our alpha of Forecastfox 0.9 and see if it is still leaking? http://thekleins.freeservers.com/misc/forecastfox-0.9.xpi
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:184.108.40.206) Gecko/20060331 Firefox/220.127.116.11 1. New profile, start firefox 2. Install http://thekleins.freeservers.com/misc/forecastfox-0.9.xpi 3. Close firefox 4. Restart firefox with logging 5. Enter '65656' for area code and OK 6. Close firefox Analysis of nspr.log with leak-gauge.pl gives C:\Documents and Settings\Ste\Desktop\firefox-18.104.22.168.en-US.win32\firefox>perl l eak-gauge.pl nspr.log Leaked inner window 18da750 (outer 18cf020) at address 18da750. ... with URI "about:blank". Leaked outer window 18cf020 at address 18cf020. Leaked document at address 2105ca0. ... with URI "chrome://browser/content/browser.xul". Leaked document at address 21c1730. ... with URI "file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Ste/Application%20Data/Mozi lla/Firefox/Profiles/e3mbceuz.1502test/forecastfox/currentcache-default.xml". Summary: Leaked 2 out of 7 DOM Windows Leaked 2 out of 30 documents Leaked 0 out of 3 docshells Subsequent close and restarts of firefox gives the same (ie: without entering the area code to get weather for). So yes, it seems this reported leakage is still present in the 0.9 build.
This is fixed with the new version, Forecastfox 0.9.2. http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/extensions/forecastfox/forecastfox-0.9.2-fx+fl+mz+ns+zm.xpi
Can anyone verify and close this bug?
(In reply to comment #4) > Can anyone verify and close this bug? > Not sure on that, but yesterday's Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:22.214.171.124) Gecko/20060615 Firefox/126.96.36.199 ID:2006061506 build with the new version of Forecastfox sure starts up quicker if nothing else.
There is a report that 0.9.3 still leaks. http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=2438921#2438921
That is a report of high memory usage, not a memory leak.
(In reply to comment #7) > That is a report of high memory usage, not a memory leak. I attempted to get that field added as a key word, but it was marked WONTFIX. Bugzilla Bug 309374 Should add "memoryuse" keyword to bugzilla.
I'm using version 0.9.3.1. I have been having problems with autocomplete, scripting and other features for nearly two months; it was only today, when I tried disabling ForecastFox, that I traced the problem to the add-on. I've also experienced high memory usage and behavior that seems awfully leak-like. My bug report is at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365919; nobody ever touched the damn thing.
stevee, VanillaMozilla, still see this?
Yes, but I'm not following it. Maybe someone should either check it out with recent versions to see if there really is (still) a leak, or else close the bug as incomplete.
This just has to be too old. Report is 5 years old, and OS no longer unsupported.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
VanillaMozilla, age is never a valid reason to close a bug report, and "OS no longer supported" is only relevant for OS-specific bugs.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: INCOMPLETE → ---
(In reply to Jesse Ruderman from comment #13) > VanillaMozilla, age is never a valid reason to close a bug report, and "OS > no longer supported" is only relevant for OS-specific bugs. True, but ForecastFox is up to version 2.0.19 now, so I don't think keeping this bug open is useful. Someone can reopen if the problem still exists in the recent version.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago → 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
Plus, there are credible reports here: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=523850 and here: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=2667408#p2667408 that indicate that it was fixed 5 years ago. In addition, no recent complaints have been noted here: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Problematic_extensions .
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.