Closed Bug 348236 Opened 18 years ago Closed 16 years ago

Combobox steals mouse event after menu is closed w. kbd Alt+Up (<select size=1>)

Categories

(Core :: Layout: Form Controls, defect)

defect
Not set
minor

Tracking

()

VERIFIED FIXED
mozilla1.9.1b3

People

(Reporter: MatsPalmgren_bugz, Assigned: Seno.Aiko, NeedInfo)

Details

(Keywords: verified1.9.1)

Attachments

(1 file, 4 obsolete files)

Combobox steals mouse event after menu is closed w. kbd Alt+Up (<select size=1>) STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. put focus on a combobox 2. Alt+Down => this opens the dropdown menu 3. Alt+Up => this closes the dropdown menu 4. click on the page (not on the combobox) => the menu opens again PLATFORMS AND BUILDS TESTED Bug occurs in SeaMonkey 2006-08-09-01 trunk on Linux Bug occurs in Firefox 2006-08-08 trunk on Linux Bug occurs in SeaMonkey 2006-08-09-06 trunk on MacOSX Bug occurs in Firefox 2006-07-22 trunk on MacOSX Bug occurs in SeaMonkey 2006-08-09-10 trunk on Windows XPSP2 Maybe related to bug 348235?
Note: the bug does not occur if the menu is closed using ESC in step 3.
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.8alpha3
Attached patch patch (obsolete) — Splinter Review
In Windows the F4 key has the same problem. What Alt-up and F4 have in common is DropDownToggleKey, which leads me to believe it's the safest place to patch this. AboutToRollup is the same function that is called when ESC is pressed.
Attachment #344811 - Flags: review?(mats.palmgren)
Comment on attachment 344811 [details] [diff] [review] patch It fixes the bug but it also changes the behaviour of F4/Alt+Up. When the drop down menu is closed with F4/Alt+Up it should select whatever item is highlighted in the menu, unlike ESC. That's what native Windows controls and IE8 does and what we currently do on all platforms. (I'm not sure this is the correct behaviour for Linux or MacOSX though, in my KDE environment Alt+Up does indeed behave like ESC. On OSX I can't find a "close-the-menu" keyboard command other than RETURN, SPACE or ESC.)
Attachment #344811 - Flags: review?(mats.palmgren) → review-
Attached patch Different approach (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Great catch, I never noticed that before, probably because only drop-down lists do this, but combo boxes don't. This patch should just fix the mouse capture problem but otherwise leave the behaviour of the keys untouched.
Attachment #344811 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #344870 - Flags: review?(mats.palmgren)
Attachment #344870 - Attachment is patch: true
Attachment #344870 - Attachment mime type: application/octet-stream → text/plain
ShowDropDown(PR_FALSE); CaptureMouseEvents(PR_FALSE); RedisplaySelectedText() is basically what ComboboxFinish() does and I'd rather have that codified in one place. Also, IE8 calls the 'onchange' handler when the menu closes with a new value. So how about something like this: if (newDroppedDownState) { ShowDropDown(PR_TRUE); } else { ComboboxFinish(mEndSelectionIndex); if (!weakFrame.IsAlive()) return; FireOnChange(); }
I tested that, it fixes this bug and makes the onchange handling match IE. But I noticed that it looks very similar to the code in the nsIDOMKeyEvent::DOM_VK_RETURN case, except that the weak frame checking is different and DOM_VK_RETURN also checks whether mComboboxFrame is null. I don't know enough about this code to decide which one is better?
IsInDropDownMode() is just a mComboboxFrame null-check. I think either nsWeakFrame check works, but I would prefer what DOM_VK_RETURN does "nsWeakFrame weakFrame(this)" also in DropDownToggleKey().
Attached patch as per comment 5 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
I got a NS_ENSURE_TRUE(presshell) warning every time I pressed alt-up or alt-down, but I believe that's bug 460680 and not related to this patch.
Attachment #344870 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #344870 - Flags: review?(mats.palmgren)
> I believe that's bug 460680 and not related to this patch. Yep. It's fixed now.
Assignee: nobody → Seno.Aiko
Comment on attachment 345862 [details] [diff] [review] as per comment 5 r=mats Thanks for looking into this! It would be great if you could make a mochitest as well, see layout/forms/test/test_bug411236.html for example on how to dispatch mouse/key events.
Attachment #345862 - Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #345862 - Flags: review+
So why mEndSelectionIndex? Why not mStartSelectionIndex? I guess for a combobox they're equal, but that's still a bit confusing, since the selectedIndex is the start index, no?
> So why mEndSelectionIndex? In this case, just to be consistent with existing code, but I guess we could change it for combobox-only code. But for commands that operates on a single item and is valid for both single/multiple selects (SPACE,UP,DOWN etc), the same code could work for both modes. (mEndSelectionIndex in a multiple select is the one having "focus", which can be any of the items, selected or not) So for consistency, I'd prefer to continue using mEndSelectionIndex also for combobox-only code. > since the selectedIndex is the start index, no? If by "start index" you mean the first selected from the top, then yes that is correct, but note that DOM selectedIndex is unrelated to mStart/EndSelectionIndex in the frame code.
> In this case, just to be consistent with existing code Which code? > but note that DOM selectedIndex is unrelated to mStart/EndSelectionIndex in the > frame code. Perhaps, but it's related to the value passed in to ComboboxFinish: onchange fires if the two differ.
> Which code? The code for VK_UP/DOWN/RETURN here for example: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/layout/forms/nsListControlFrame.cpp#2580 > Perhaps, but it's related to the value passed in ... Yes, that is correct. I just don't see why passing mStartSelectionIndex would be less confusing.
Because the start of the selection is what the content node considers to be the selectedIndex. If only one option is selected there is no difference, but if there are multiple options selected this matters, no?
(In reply to comment #10) > It would be great if you could make a mochitest as well, see > layout/forms/test/test_bug411236.html for example on how to > dispatch mouse/key events. So, looking at that test I'd need to use use enablePrivilege to synthesize these events but bug 462483 wants to eliminate that function. Is there already an alternative I could use?
Just use it for now, until we sort out how we're fixing bug 462483.
Attached file Testcase (obsolete) —
Looks a bit hacky, is there a way to write this without the timeouts?
Attachment #346123 - Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #346123 - Flags: review?(mats.palmgren)
(In reply to comment #15) > Because the start of the selection is what the content node considers to be > the selectedIndex. Yes, but "start of the selection" is not what mStartSelectionIndex is about. Try data:text/html,<select multiple><option>0<option>1<option>2 Click on "2", then Shift-click on "0" (selecting all items) -- now we have mStartSelectionIndex=2 and mEndSelectionIndex=0 and DOM selectedIndex is 0 Control-click on "0" (deselecting it) -- now we have mStartSelectionIndex=0 and mEndSelectionIndex=0 and DOM selectedIndex is 1 I think of them in Selection terms; mStartSelectionIndex is like the anchor node and mEndSelectionIndex is the focus node and neither has anything to do with if any one <option> is selected or not. They just say which item, or range of items, the current command should operate on. For single item commands it's the focus node. As you say, for a combobox it doesn't matter, but I think it's helps when reading the code if one thinks of a combobox just as a list with an added "single select" constraint. At least for mStart/EndSelectionIndex.
Comment on attachment 346123 [details] Testcase This looks great! A couple of nits: please use the same indentation for all the functions for readability (2 or 4 spaces whichever you prefer). It would be nice if we could also check that we got an "onchange". If you add for example: onchange="++onchanges;" to the <select> and "var onchangesBefore = onchanges;" at the top of testKey() and then a few "is(onchanges - onchangesBefore, 1 or 0, 'onchange');" at strategic places. Or something like that...
Attachment #345862 - Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky) → superreview+
Comment on attachment 345862 [details] [diff] [review] as per comment 5 OK, I'm ok with this, but add a comment to the effect that mEndSelectionIndex is the last item that got selected?
> Looks a bit hacky, is there a way to write this without the timeouts? Are the timeouts "real" timeouts (waiting for something that may not happen for a while), or are they just waiting on an async reflow or some such? If the latter, then could just use a zero delay and document that that's what they're doing; in that case there is no hack involved.
Attached patch patch + testcaseSplinter Review
This addresses the review comments (I hope).
Attachment #345862 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #346123 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #346432 - Flags: review?(mats.palmgren)
Attachment #346123 - Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #346123 - Flags: review?(mats.palmgren)
Attachment #346432 - Flags: review?(mats.palmgren) → review+
Comment on attachment 346432 [details] [diff] [review] patch + testcase Excellent. r=mats
Attachment #346432 - Flags: approval1.9.1?
Comment on attachment 346432 [details] [diff] [review] patch + testcase Fairly simple patch that only affects Alt+Up/Down and F4.
Comment on attachment 346432 [details] [diff] [review] patch + testcase a191=beltzner
Attachment #346432 - Flags: approval1.9.1? → approval1.9.1+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: mozilla1.8alpha3 → mozilla1.9.1b3
Keywords: fixed1.9.1
verified using attached testcase and Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090130 Shiretoko/3.1b3pre (used 3.0.5 to verify that I understood and saw the bug).
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
I have a question, what's doing the test for this bug fix? > 48 function keypressOnSelect(key, modifiers) { > 49 WinUtils.focus(eSelect) > 50 WinUtils.sendKeyEvent("keyup", key, 0, modifiers, WinUtils.KEY_FLAG_PREVENT_DEFAULT) > 51 WinUtils.sendKeyEvent("keypress", key, 0, modifiers, WinUtils.KEY_FLAG_PREVENT_DEFAULT) > 52 WinUtils.sendKeyEvent("keydown", key, 0, modifiers, WinUtils.KEY_FLAG_PREVENT_DEFAULT) > 53 } There are two strange things: 1. Why the event order is keyup -> keypress -> keydown?? I have no idea for such case. 2. Why all of the events are marked as defaultPrevented at dispatching? This is also non-realistic behavior.
Flags: needinfo?(Seno.Aiko)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: