Closed
Bug 348804
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
in-param for nsMsgKeyArray.h breaks obj-c build for embedded applications.
Categories
(MailNews Core :: Backend, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: nick.kreeger, Assigned: nick.kreeger)
Details
(Keywords: fixed1.8.1)
Attachments
(1 file)
1.10 KB,
patch
|
hwaara
:
review+
Bienvenu
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
In msMsgKeyArray.h the following method is defined: PRUint32 Add(nsMsgKey id) { ... The problem with this is that |id| is a reserved keyword in objective-c, thus breaking any embedding support for cocoa applications.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
Here is a patch to fix this problem
Assignee | ||
Updated•18 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Updated•18 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → nick.kreeger
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 233928 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed patch. r=me on anything besides "id" for the var name. :) If the mailnews maintainers has some preference for the var name, I defer to them.
Attachment #233928 -
Flags: superreview?(bienvenu)
Attachment #233928 -
Flags: review+
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 233928 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed patch. I'd prefer key. As long as that's OK, I'll change it to key and check that in...
Attachment #233928 -
Flags: superreview?(bienvenu) → superreview+
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•18 years ago
|
||
It doesn't matter to me, I can check it in if you want with "key" (i have CVS access).
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
oh, ok, Nick, go ahead and check it in with key. If you need this on the 2.0 branch, you can land it there as well, or if you don't have a branch tree, I can do that.
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•18 years ago
|
||
Checked in to MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH, waiting for my machine to spin a trunk build before i land it there.
Keywords: fixed1.8.1
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•18 years ago
|
||
Fixed trunk.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 8•18 years ago
|
||
I don't want to nitpick too much, but isn't approval1.8.1 needed these days for patches that go on the 1.8 branch (ok, I know, small patch, mailnews/-only, but still) :)?
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #8) > I don't want to nitpick too much, but isn't approval1.8.1 needed these days for > patches that go on the 1.8 branch (ok, I know, small patch, mailnews/-only, but > still) :)? > "If you need this on the 2.0 branch, you can land it there as well, or if you don't have a branch tree, I can do that." I understand, but since I was given the go ahead for 2.0 (1.8) i landed it, my bad.
Comment 10•18 years ago
|
||
If bienvenu has told you that you can checkin on 1.8 branch it's ok I guess (at least not your "fault" then :)...
Updated•16 years ago
|
Product: Core → MailNews Core
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•