Closed
Bug 349323
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
profile-startup listener leaked
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: UI Design, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: ajschult784, Assigned: sgautherie)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug, )
Details
(Keywords: memory-leak)
Attachments
(1 file)
1.33 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
After bug 343602, nye reports that nsUpdateNotifier profile-startup listener gets leaked. Neil said "probably because nsUpdateNotifier is a global rather than a constructor". Update notifier is going away on trunk, so this only relevant for branch.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #0) > After bug 343602, nye reports that nsUpdateNotifier profile-startup listener > gets leaked. Now, 'Linux nye Dep bloat' is on (1.9) trunk, no 'Mozilla1.8-SeaMonkey' box reports leaks :-( > Update notifier is going away on trunk, so this only relevant for branch. This file was removed from 1.9(.0) trunk: <http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvslog.cgi?file=mozilla/xpfe/components/updates/src/nsUpdateNotifier.js&mark=1.13> {{ 1.13 kairo%kairo.at 2008-05-02 10:34 cvs remove the xpfe files obsoleted by the recent checkin for bug 383085 which had r=mento, r/sr=Neil via IRC for cvs removal (files are unused now) }}
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #0) > Neil said "probably because nsUpdateNotifier is a global rather than a > constructor". I don't know much about that. But I think removing (all) observers should be an improvement/fix, even if I don't know how to test the (leak) result.
Assignee: jag → sgautherie.bz
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #328941 -
Flags: superreview?(neil)
Attachment #328941 -
Flags: review?(neil)
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Version: Trunk → SeaMonkey 1.1 Branch
Comment 3•16 years ago
|
||
Somehow I doubt we'd take a leak fix on branch, especially without a way of checking for the leak. I'm not sure why I might have thought that nsUpdateNotifier being a global would make any difference. I have a hunch that the code doesn't actually need to keep a reference to the timer, thus avoiding all the fiddling about with shutdown observers.
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #328941 -
Flags: superreview?(neil)
Attachment #328941 -
Flags: review?(neil)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
R.WontFix per previous comments.
Blocks: SmTestLeak
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
QA Contact: ui-design
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•