Open
Bug 350900
Opened 18 years ago
Updated 18 years ago
Resolved bugs should be styled differently in the bug list
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Query/Bug List, enhancement, P4)
Bugzilla
Query/Bug List
Tracking
()
NEW
People
(Reporter: ce.ceo, Unassigned)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6
These items should be struck through so the user does not have to move their focus to the status column. Maybe a color change would be more appropriate, althoug not as consistent as a strike through as strike through is the nearly global effect style applied to closed bugs.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Search for a bug that has already been closed/resolved
Actual Results:
Result has no style that explains its status
Expected Results:
There should be a style applied to the list item that shows that the bug is closed.
![]() |
||
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
Only CLOSED bugs are marked as such. You can easily change this behavior by editing the correct CSS file. This is not a bug -> enh.
Severity: normal → enhancement
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
I don't think we should strike them through--sometimes RESOLVED DUPLICATE or RESOLVED WONTFIX bugs are good to be able to clearly read.
But perhaps we could style them differently somehow.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Windows XP → All
Priority: -- → P4
Hardware: PC → All
Summary: Resolved bugs are not struckthrough on bug search results list → Resolved bugs should be styled differently in the bug list
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
"RESOLVED WONTFIX" should be an illegal state. WONTFIX is not a resolution. Period. CLOSED WONTFIX is pretty bad. RESOLVED WONTFIX is insane.
Anyway, what do you mean editing the corect css file? My user agent file?
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•