This one's a little trickier, because there's more code for inserting keywords. But we can handle it!
Created attachment 236742 [details] [diff] [review] v1 Here we go. Tested and works. You'll also notice that I did a bit of refactoring in run_create_validators to make things simpler overall.
Assignee: create-and-change → mkanat
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #236742 - Flags: review?(bugzilla-mozilla)
Created attachment 236839 [details] [diff] [review] v1.1 Fixed bitrot.
Attachment #236839 - Flags: review?(bugzilla-mozilla) → review?(LpSolit)
Comment on attachment 236839 [details] [diff] [review] v1.1 The patch is slightly bitrotten. I will attach the unbitrotten one in a few seconds. Your patch is working fine. r=LpSolit
Attachment #236839 - Flags: review?(LpSolit) → review+
Created attachment 237463 [details] [diff] [review] patch, v1.2 Here is the one I tested.
Checking in post_bug.cgi; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/post_bug.cgi,v <-- post_bug.cgi new revision: 1.177; previous revision: 1.176 done Checking in Bugzilla/Bug.pm; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm,v <-- Bug.pm new revision: 1.152; previous revision: 1.151 done
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
*** Bug 323241 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I must say I usually add some keyword for completeness. Doing it after bug report seems to be spam, IMO. Can I open a bug to request to move back keyword insertion into enter_bug.cgi?
(In reply to comment #7) > Can I open a bug to request to move back keyword insertion into enter_bug.cgi? Um, it's still on enter_bug. This bug has nothing to do with the UI.
I don't see it. Fields displayed are Product, Component, Hardware, OS, Identifier, URL, Summary, Details, Reproducible, Steps, Result, Expected, Other info, Security, Severity.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.