Closed
Bug 353567
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
Wrong default alarm set on new events (after start instead of before)
Categories
(Calendar :: Alarms, defect)
Calendar
Alarms
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
0.7
People
(Reporter: ssitter, Assigned: mattwillis)
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 2 obsolete files)
2.27 KB,
patch
|
dbo
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
3.01 KB,
patch
|
michael.buettner
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Default alarm settings don't work properly if 'More>>' section of item dialog was not shown (wrong alarm set) Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start Sunbird with clean profile 2. Go to Preferences->Alarms and set default alarm to On, 5 min before 3. Select File->New Event and create new event. Do NOT open 'More>>' section of item dialog. 4. Wait until alarm is shown Actual Results: Alarm is triggert 5 minutes after event start time. Expected Results: Alarm is triggert 5 minutes before event start time. Additional Information: Console shows that wrong information is read from dialog: considering alarm for item:foo offset:PT5M, which makes alarm time:2006/09/20 21:55:00 UTC now is 2006/09/20 21:47:52 UTC alarm is in the future Repeat step 3 and 4 but open 'More>>' section before saving the alarm. This time the correct value is read from dialog: considering alarm for item:bar offset:-PT5M, which makes alarm time:2006/09/20 21:45:00 UTC now is 2006/09/20 21:49:38 UTC Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060919 Calendar/0.3a2+
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
Happens also if event is created with drag and drop in day/week view.
Flags: blocking0.3?
Summary: Default alarm settings don't work properly if 'More>>' section of item dialog was not shown (wrong alarm set) → Wrong default alarm set on new events (after start instead of before)
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #240343 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #240347 -
Flags: second-review?(dmose)
Attachment #240343 -
Flags: second-review?(dmose)
Comment on attachment 240347 [details] [diff] [review] does it the same way the event dialog does it. looks good
Attachment #240347 -
Flags: first-review+
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 240347 [details] [diff] [review] does it the same way the event dialog does it. r2=dmose
Attachment #240347 -
Flags: second-review?(dmose) → second-review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•18 years ago
|
||
Patch checked in on MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH and trunk. -> FIXED
Updated•18 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reporter | ||
Updated•18 years ago
|
Flags: blocking0.3?
Comment 7•18 years ago
|
||
verified fixed with Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060928 Sunbird/0.3RC1
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Reporter | ||
Updated•18 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [litmus testcase wanted]
Comment 9•17 years ago
|
||
Should this be re-opened or newly filed??? I get exactly these results in Lighting 0.5 - in latest nightly (with new prototype dialog) it is even being displayed wrong (15 minutes after, when I select 15 minutes before) So my question: has this been ever fixed for Lightning?
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #9) > Should this be re-opened or newly filed??? This was fixed for the non-prototype dialog in Sunbird and Lightning. If you experience a similar issue with the new prototype dialog file a new bug.
Comment 11•17 years ago
|
||
I further researched the problem and found, that this occured, because my prefs were being set wrong (german locale, unit=Minuten) which lead to the situation, that the 'catch(ex)' part was executed. So the correct patch would be to either set it to '-15' there, or to set 'isNegative' after all this, which I chose. You can reproduce the problem by manually setting a wrong 'calendar.alarms.eventalarmunit' or 'calendar.alarms.todoalarmunit' and then create a new event/todo.
Attachment #274743 -
Flags: review?(lilmatt)
Comment 12•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 274743 [details] [diff] [review] Corrected attachment 240347 [details] [diff] [review] to address default '15 mintues before', when pref cannot be read (now in calendar-item-editing.js) Sven, thanks for the patch. Shifting review request to daniel as he's responsible for alarms (as well as philipp). Please see [1] for the list of possible reviewers. [1] http://wiki.mozilla.org/Calendar:Module_Ownership
Attachment #274743 -
Flags: review?(lilmatt) → review?(daniel.boelzle)
Updated•17 years ago
|
Status: VERIFIED → REOPENED
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Hardware: PC → All
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 13•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 274743 [details] [diff] [review] Corrected attachment 240347 [details] [diff] [review] to address default '15 mintues before', when pref cannot be read (now in calendar-item-editing.js) > try { > if (alarmsBranch.getIntPref("onforevents") == 1) { > var alarmOffset = Components.classes["@mozilla.org/calendar/duration;1"] > .createInstance(Components.interfaces.calIDuration); > try { > var units = alarmsBranch.getCharPref("eventalarmunit"); > alarmOffset[units] = alarmsBranch.getIntPref("eventalarmlen"); >- alarmOffset.isNegative = true; > } catch(ex) { > alarmOffset.minutes = 15; > } >+ alarmOffset.isNegative = true; > aItem.alarmOffset = alarmOffset; > aItem.alarmRelated = Components.interfaces.calIItemBase.ALARM_RELATED_START; > } > } catch (ex) { > Components.utils.reportError( > "Failed to apply default alarm settings to event: " + ex); > } r=dbo for this one, although I am wondering whether we should apply a default at all if it could not be read out correctly. Why not just remove the inner try-catch (i.e. the fallback to 15 minutes)? The user currently doesn't get any feedback why his default value doesn't work, but always gets 15 minutes.
Attachment #274743 -
Flags: review?(daniel.boelzle) → review+
Updated•17 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 14•17 years ago
|
||
IMO we shouldn't silently swallow the pref getter exception.
Attachment #240347 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #277715 -
Flags: review?(michael.buettner)
Updated•17 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 15•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 277715 [details] [diff] [review] don't silently swallow pref errors The inner try-block doesn't make sense -> r=mickey.
Attachment #277715 -
Flags: review?(michael.buettner) → review+
Comment 16•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #15) > (From update of attachment 277715 [details] [diff] [review]) > The inner try-block doesn't make sense -> r=mickey. Totally right, and the outer one does report an error. I would not have searched for the wrong sign of the alarm, if there would have been no alarm set... -> vote=Sven
Comment 17•17 years ago
|
||
Checked in on HEAD and MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago → 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → 0.7
Comment 18•17 years ago
|
||
verified with Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.8pre) Gecko/20070921 Calendar/0.7pre
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Flags: in-litmus+
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•