Closed Bug 368972 Opened 19 years ago Closed 18 years ago

Default width/height for plugin placeholders should be 240px/200px

Categories

(Core :: Layout, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: martijn.martijn, Assigned: martijn.martijn)

References

()

Details

Attachments

(4 files)

This is a follow-up from bug 367247, the testcase is from that bug. The last example of the testcase has no width/height set. In that case the width/height of the plugin placeholder should be 240px/200px. I guess this could be fixed in missingPlugin.css, but biesi mentioned that the embed element should get this width/height from: http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/layout/generic/nsObjectFrame.cpp#596
Yeah, after thinking more about that I was wrong. I broke that when I rewrote pluginfinder. This should be sized explicitly now.
OS: Windows XP → All
Hardware: PC → All
> This should be sized explicitly now. meaning: CSS should be added somewhere to do that sizing.
Attached file testcase1
Attached file testcase2
Attached patch patch?Splinter Review
I think this fixes it for most cases, except it doesn't fix the last case of testcase1, where width="xxx". Basically, I need a selector(s) that fo all plugin elements that don't have a (valid) width/height set. It seems to me that isn't possible with css.
Attachment #254830 - Flags: review?(cbiesinger)
Comment on attachment 254830 [details] [diff] [review] patch? hm, if this works r=biesi
Attachment #254830 - Flags: review?(cbiesinger) → review+
Comment on attachment 254830 [details] [diff] [review] patch? Well, yes, it works, except for the width="xxx" case. But I guess that's probably not a big deal.
Attachment #254830 - Flags: superreview?(dbaron)
(In reply to comment #5) > Basically, I need a selector(s) that fo all plugin elements that don't have a > (valid) width/height set. It seems to me that isn't possible with css. Or you need a way of making your style rules apply at a level of the cascade lower than the width/height attributes.
Comment on attachment 254830 [details] [diff] [review] patch? sr=dbaron -- good enough for now, but please file a bug on doing it right (so it applies to any invalid height/width attribute by being at a lower level of the cascade)
Attachment #254830 - Flags: superreview?(dbaron) → superreview-
Attachment #254830 - Flags: approval1.9?
Assignee: nobody → martijn.martijn
Comment on attachment 254830 [details] [diff] [review] patch? a19=dbaron
Attachment #254830 - Flags: approval1.9? → approval1.9+
Checking in missingPlugin.css; /cvsroot/mozilla/toolkit/themes/winstripe/mozapps/plugins/missingPlugin.css,v < -- missingPlugin.css new revision: 1.4; previous revision: 1.3 Checked into trunk. I filed bug 390700 as a follow-up for a better solution as was suggested by dbaron in comment 9.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Apparently this fix wasn't applied to pinstripe. This fixes that and adds a mochitest for it using the example testcases.
Attachment #337869 - Flags: superreview?
Attachment #337869 - Flags: review?
Attachment #337869 - Flags: superreview?(dbaron)
Attachment #337869 - Flags: superreview?
Attachment #337869 - Flags: review?(cbiesinger)
Attachment #337869 - Flags: review?
I'll fix the alignment oddity in Makefile.in on checkin.
Attachment #337869 - Flags: superreview?(dbaron)
Attachment #337869 - Flags: superreview+
Attachment #337869 - Flags: review?(cbiesinger)
Attachment #337869 - Flags: review+
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: