Closed Bug 374666 Opened 19 years ago Closed 18 years ago

Privacy policy missing on from 'Report Broken Web Page...

Categories

(Other Applications Graveyard :: Reporter, defect)

Product:
Other Applications Graveyard
Component:
Reporter
Platform:
x86
macOS
Type:
defect
Priority:
Not set
Severity:
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

Status:
RESOLVED INVALID

People

(Reporter: ray, Assigned: raccettura)

Details

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.9a3pre) Gecko/20070317 Minefield/3.0a3pre Select the Help->'Report Broken Web Site...' menu option. Check the 'I have read...' checkbox. There is a text field on that page. One cannot edit in it, so it is pretty useless.
Which text field do you mean? You mean the one on the first page that has the license in it? That isn't meant to be editable, I didn't think.
Ah. That is supposed to be the license text? Then that is the problem. It is blank. I thought it was a text field in which I could fill in more information.
Summary: cannot into text field for 'Report Broken Web Page...' → Privacy policy missing on from 'Report Broken Web Page...
Assignee: nobody → robert
Component: General → Reporter
Product: Firefox → Other Applications
QA Contact: general → xul-client
WFM on Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9a3pre) Gecko/20070324 Minefield/3.0a3pre
WFM on windows - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a4pre) Gecko/20070327 Minefield/3.0a4pre ID:2007032704
SBFM (still broken for me?) - Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.9a3pre) Gecko/20070324 Minefield/3.0a3pre but, FM on linux, trunk built last night on ubuntu 6.10.
Ray: what is the value of the pref: extensions.reporter.privacyURL Make sure it's on it's default, and not changed to something custom.
Interesting. I have two profiles I usually use. When I launch this Minefield from 20070324 with the 'minefield1' profile, I checked the URL, and it looked ok. Then I went to the menu item and I see the privacy document! Then I quit and relaunched the Minefield with my default profile, with which I am usually running 2.0.0.3 and the URL looked fine still, and the privacy policy did not show up. So, the bugs still reproduces, even though the preference setting is good. I am going to tar up and attach these two profiles. Maybe someone knows what to look for in them to see a difference.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Product: Other Applications → Other Applications Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.