Closed
Bug 377395
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
remove .doubleclick.net from network.dns.ipv4OnlyDomains
Categories
(Core :: Networking, defect)
Core
Networking
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
mozilla1.9alpha8
People
(Reporter: jo.hermans, Assigned: jo.hermans)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
959 bytes,
patch
|
benjamin
:
review+
benjamin
:
superreview+
benjamin
:
approval1.9+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
.doubleclick.net is currently the only entry in the network.dns.ipv4OnlyDomains blacklist, see bug 68796.
Currently, the domain doesn't present a problem anymore for IPv6 lookups, it must have been fixed between 2005 and now. It's still an IPv4 only network, but the DNS-server doesn't seem to be broken anymore.
http://www.cnri.dit.ie/cgi-bin/check_aaaa.pl?dom=doubleclick.net
http://www.cnri.dit.ie/cgi-bin/check_aaaa.pl?dom=ad.doubleclick.net
Can we remove it from the blacklist ?
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
Jo, I took a quick look and indeed it seems to be working now. Can you provide a patch to do this? If so, it should be very easy to get it into the tree.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
> Jo, I took a quick look and indeed it seems to be working now. Can you provide
> a patch to do this? If so, it should be very easy to get it into the tree.
>
I can't produce a patch because I don't have access to a cvs (anal firewall restrictions ; wincvs can't authenticate), so I can't produce a cvs-diff. I can produce a patch file with "diff -c", but that's not the same thing.
It's only about removing the line at http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/modules/libpref/src/init/all.js#661 .
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
Is it really necessary that "network.dns.ipv4OnlyDomains" exist? Isn't it disused?
I've been changing the value of the configuration (.doubleclick.net by any word) more than a year ago and, there hasn't been any problem.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070221 SeaMonkey/1.1.1
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/2007040314 Firefox/2.0.0.3 (Ubuntu-feisty)
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.9?
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
Somebody please post a patch and request reviews, we should take this. JHermans, you could just produce a patch against a tarball or against MXR raw.
Flags: blocking1.9? → blocking1.9-
Whiteboard: [wanted-1.9]
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
Attachment #279464 -
Flags: superreview?(benjamin)
Attachment #279464 -
Flags: review?(benjamin)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•17 years ago
|
||
that had to be the reverse ofcourse
Assignee: nobody → jo.hermans
Attachment #279464 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #279466 -
Flags: superreview?(benjamin)
Attachment #279466 -
Flags: review?(benjamin)
Attachment #279464 -
Flags: superreview?(benjamin)
Attachment #279464 -
Flags: review?(benjamin)
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #279466 -
Flags: superreview?(benjamin)
Attachment #279466 -
Flags: superreview+
Attachment #279466 -
Flags: review?(benjamin)
Attachment #279466 -
Flags: review+
Attachment #279466 -
Flags: approval1.9+
Updated•17 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 7•17 years ago
|
||
Checking in modules/libpref/src/init/all.js;
/cvsroot/mozilla/modules/libpref/src/init/all.js,v <-- all.js
new revision: 3.691; previous revision: 3.690
done
Comment 8•17 years ago
|
||
Also, cound you use diff -wu instead of diff -wc next time? Unified diffs are smaller and easier to read.
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #8)
> Also, cound you use diff -wu instead of diff -wc next time? Unified diffs are
> smaller and easier to read.
>
Can't, the diff on Solaris 9 doesn't support -u
Verified as fixed in
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a8pre) Gecko/2007090604 Minefield/3.0a8pre
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Updated•17 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.9 M8
Updated•17 years ago
|
Flags: wanted1.9+
Whiteboard: [wanted-1.9]
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•