Crash [@ nsLinkableAccessible::CacheActionContent] with appending area and strange prefix

RESOLVED FIXED

Status

()

Core
Disability Access APIs
--
critical
RESOLVED FIXED
11 years ago
6 years ago

People

(Reporter: Martijn Wargers (dead), Assigned: Mats Palmgren (vacation - back in August))

Tracking

(Blocks: 1 bug, {crash, testcase, verified1.8.1.8})

Trunk
crash, testcase, verified1.8.1.8
Points:
---
Bug Flags:
in-testsuite ?

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

(Whiteboard: [sg:nse null-deref], crash signature)

Attachments

(5 attachments, 2 obsolete attachments)

(Reporter)

Description

11 years ago
The testcase uses enhanced privileges, so you need to download it to your computer to get the crash.
It also crashes a recent 1.8 branch build.

Talkback ID: TB31199479H
nsLinkableAccessible::CacheActionContent  [mozilla/accessible/src/base/nsbasewidgetaccessible.cpp, line 250]
nsLinkableAccessible::Init  [mozilla/accessible/src/base/nsbasewidgetaccessible.cpp, line 286]
nsAccessibilityService::GetAccessible  [mozilla/accessible/src/base/nsaccessibilityservice.cpp, line 1175]
nsThreadManager::GetIsMainThread  [mozilla/xpcom/threads/nsthreadmanager.cpp, line 279]
(Reporter)

Comment 1

11 years ago
Created attachment 261578 [details]
testcase
Assignee: aaronleventhal → mats.palmgren
OS: Windows XP → All
Hardware: PC → All
Whiteboard: [sg:nse null-deref]
Created attachment 261592 [details]
stack
Created attachment 261593 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch rev. 1
Created attachment 261594 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch rev. 1 (diff -w)
Attachment #261594 - Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)

Comment 5

11 years ago
Comment on attachment 261594 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch rev. 1 (diff -w)

Mats, can yo udescribe what kind of object is <a> or <area> that is not nsILink?
Attachment #261594 - Flags: review?(aaronleventhal) → review+
Created attachment 262262 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch rev. 2 (diff -w)

(In reply to comment #5)
> (From update of attachment 261594 [details] [diff] [review])
> Mats, can yo udescribe what kind of object is <a> or <area> that is not
> nsILink?

An element that isn't [X]HTML.  Now that I think about it, we should check
that before trying QI (it's how we do it in other places in the code).

Same patch as before with the addtion to the if-condition:
        walkUpContent->IsNodeOfType(nsINode::eHTML)
Attachment #261593 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #261594 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #262262 - Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)

Comment 7

11 years ago
Comment on attachment 262262 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch rev. 2 (diff -w)

Something about the line breaks --  this patch is unreadable.
Attachment #262262 - Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)
Attachment #262262 - Attachment is patch: true
Attachment #262262 - Attachment mime type: text/html → text/plain
Comment on attachment 262262 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch rev. 2 (diff -w)

I forgot to click the Patch checkbox, sorry.
Attachment #262262 - Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)

Updated

11 years ago
Attachment #262262 - Flags: review?(aaronleventhal) → review+
Checked in to trunk at 2007-05-06 02:03	PDT.

-> FIXED
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 10 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite?
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Group: security
Flags: wanted1.8.1.x?
Flags: wanted1.8.0.x?
Flags: blocking1.8.1.5?
Flags: blocking1.8.0.13?
Don't need to block on a null deref, but will approve the patch if you want to land it on the branch.
Flags: wanted1.8.1.x?
Flags: wanted1.8.0.x?
Flags: blocking1.8.1.5?
Flags: blocking1.8.0.13?

Updated

10 years ago
Attachment #262262 - Flags: approval1.8.1.5?
Comment on attachment 262262 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch rev. 2 (diff -w)

approved for 1.8.1.5, a=juanb for release-drivers
Attachment #262262 - Flags: approval1.8.1.5? → approval1.8.1.5+
Comment on attachment 262262 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch rev. 2 (diff -w)

This patch does not apply to branches.
Attachment #262262 - Flags: approval1.8.1.5+
Created attachment 270503 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch rev. 2.1 (for branches)
Created attachment 270504 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch rev. 2.1 (for branches) (diff -w)

This makes nsLinkableAccessible::CacheActionContent() up-to-date with
the trunk version.  Notice the added 'break;'s.

I can't crash branch builds on Linux on the testcase without the patch,
although I suspect there could be a way to do it given the similarity
of the code.  Aaron, do you still want this for branches?
Attachment #270504 - Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)

Updated

10 years ago
Attachment #270504 - Flags: review?(aaronleventhal) → review+
Attachment #270504 - Flags: approval1.8.1.7?
Attachment #270504 - Flags: approval1.8.0.13?
Attachment #270504 - Flags: approval1.8.0.13? → approval1.8.0.14?
Comment on attachment 270504 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch rev. 2.1 (for branches) (diff -w)

approved for 1.8.1.7, a=dveditz for release-drivers
Attachment #270504 - Flags: approval1.8.1.7?
Attachment #270504 - Flags: approval1.8.1.7+
Attachment #270504 - Flags: approval1.8.0.14?
Attachment #270504 - Flags: approval1.8.0.14-
MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH
mozilla/accessible/src/base/nsBaseWidgetAccessible.cpp 	1.38.2.5 
Keywords: fixed1.8.1.7
verified fixed 1.8.1.7 using : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.8.1.7pre) Gecko/2007091303 BonEcho/2.0.0.7pre and Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.7pre) Gecko/2007091303 BonEcho/2.0.0.7pre (Fedora F7) 

no crash the steps to reproduce - local testcase 

-> adding verified keyword
Keywords: fixed1.8.1.7 → verified1.8.1.7
Crash Signature: [@ nsLinkableAccessible::CacheActionContent]
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.