Closed Bug 386114 Opened 15 years ago Closed 14 years ago

Version/config bumps for Gecko1.9a6 release

Categories

(Release Engineering :: General, defect, P2)

defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: joduinn, Assigned: joduinn)

Details

Attachments

(5 files, 1 obsolete file)

Version/config bumps for Gecko1.9a6 release
Assignee: build → joduinn
Severity: normal → blocker
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Priority: -- → P1
Between a5 and a6, we changed from argo-vm to fx-linux-tbox and also picked up these mozconfig changes. Merging as appropriate to the release branch.
Attachment #270094 - Flags: review?(benjamin)
This is the set of changes to the linux/win32/macosx tinder_config.pl files, as needed for the 1.9a6 release.

The changes are:
- renaming 1.9a5 to 1.9a6
- adding info about karma (machine used) instead of argo-vm
Attachment #270098 - Flags: review?
Attachment #270098 - Attachment mime type: video/x-dv → text/plain
Attachment #270098 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #270098 - Flags: review?
changes to linux/win32/macosx tinder_config.pl files

This is the set of changes to the linux/win32/macosx tinder_config.pl files, as
needed for the 1.9a6 release.

The changes are:
- renaming 1.9a5 to 1.9a6
- adding info about fx-linux-tbox (build machine used) instead of argo-vm
Attachment #270100 - Flags: review?(rhelmer)
thanks to rhelmer who caught a mistake in my first attachment, hence new attachment.
Attachment #270100 - Flags: review?(rhelmer) → review+
Landed the tinder-config changes attachment 270100 [details] [diff] [review]:

Checking in linux/tinder-config.pl;
/cvsroot/mozilla/tools/tinderbox-configs/firefox/linux/tinder-config.pl,v  <--  tinder-config.pl
new revision: 1.2.2.9; previous revision: 1.2.2.8
done
Checking in macosx/tinder-config.pl;
/cvsroot/mozilla/tools/tinderbox-configs/firefox/macosx/tinder-config.pl,v  <--  tinder-config.pl
new revision: 1.9.2.11; previous revision: 1.9.2.10
done
Checking in win32/tinder-config.pl;
/cvsroot/mozilla/tools/tinderbox-configs/firefox/win32/tinder-config.pl,v  <--  tinder-config.pl
new revision: 1.3.2.9; previous revision: 1.3.2.8
done
Comment on attachment 270094 [details] [diff] [review]
mozconfig changes between a5 and a6

Moving review to cf; there's talk about starting builds tonight, and he's in a more reasonable timezone for that.
Attachment #270094 - Flags: review?(benjamin) → review?(nrthomas)
Comment on attachment 270094 [details] [diff] [review]
mozconfig changes between a5 and a6

Looks good, r=cf.

Based on 
http://mxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/browser/confvars.sh#43
the lines
  ac_add_options --enable-libxul
  ac_add_options --enable-places-bookmarks
can go from both nightly and release configs, or do we chose to over specify ?
Attachment #270094 - Flags: review?(nrthomas) → review+
We're already doing this for nightlies, and it completes the platform set.
Attachment #270302 - Flags: review?
Attachment #270302 - Flags: review? → review?(ted.mielczarek)
Attachment #270302 - Attachment description: Enable Breakpad symbol push for 1.9a6 → Enable Breakpad symbol push on Linux for 1.9a6
Attachment #270302 - Flags: review?(ted.mielczarek) → review+
Comment on attachment 270321 [details] [diff] [review]
Mac & Windows mozconfig changes for libxul landing

AIUI, these are the defaults that nightlies build, so this should be fine, but I'm quite curious why we're maintaining all of these options manually
Attachment #270321 - Flags: review?(rhelmer) → review+
(In reply to comment #10)
> (From update of attachment 270321 [details] [diff] [review])
> AIUI, these are the defaults that nightlies build, so this should be fine, but
> I'm quite curious why we're maintaining all of these options manually

Thanks for the review. I was mimicking attachment 270094 [details] [diff] [review], but am also curious about this.

(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > (From update of attachment 270321 [details] [diff] [review] [details])
> > AIUI, these are the defaults that nightlies build, so this should be fine, but
> > I'm quite curious why we're maintaining all of these options manually
> 
> Thanks for the review. I was mimicking attachment 270094 [details] [diff] [review], but am also curious
> about this.

jodouinn filed follow-up bug 386338 about this.
Attachment #270587 - Flags: review?(benjamin) → review+
Note, addons.mozilla.org also needs to be updated. How and when is this performed?
So that I can submit my updated theme for the FF nightlies.
Alfred, file a bug somewhere in the addons.mozilla.org Product. Not sure which component is right, #addons on IRC would know.
Priority: P1 → P2
mconnor, should we bump to 3.0b1pre/1.9b1pre ? Apologies if that is what should have been done in the first place.
per offline discussion w/mconnor, we should use "3.0a7" or "1.9a7".
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.