Closed
Bug 386606
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
char ​ (zero width space) now rendered incorrectly
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Text and Fonts, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: p.ernst, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(12 files, 1 obsolete file)
44.35 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
30.35 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
3.68 KB,
text/html
|
Details | |
272 bytes,
text/plain
|
Details | |
160 bytes,
text/html
|
Details | |
140 bytes,
text/html
|
Details | |
159 bytes,
text/html
|
Details | |
159 bytes,
text/html
|
Details | |
168 bytes,
text/html
|
Details | |
151 bytes,
text/html
|
Details | |
167 bytes,
text/html
|
Details | |
166 bytes,
text/html
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070222 SeaMonkey/1.1.1
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9a6pre) Gecko/20070702 Minefield/3.0a6pre
After Bug 9101 "(shy) – Break lines at soft hyphens (­)..." was reported to be fixed, I found the following behavior:
Yes, ­ is working now.
But the character ​ (zero width space) is rendered now incorrectly (which used to be fine before the fix). The line breaking behavior is correct, but a square is rendered for this character instead of just nothing.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.TestText​TestText​TestText
2.
3.
Updated•17 years ago
|
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
The tests at the bottom of that page WFM on XPSP2.
(In reply to comment #1)
> The tests at the bottom of that page WFM on XPSP2.
Yes, works on Windows XP
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a6pre) Gecko/20070630 Minefield/3.0a6pre
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
Seems WFM on Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9a6pre) Gecko/20070702 Minefield/3.0a6pre ID:2007070204 too
This screenshot was taken on the same computer with firefox-2.0.0.4.
Attachment #270621 -
Attachment description: screenshot with firefox-2.0.0.4 (same display/profile) → screenshot with firefox-2.0.0.4 (same display/profile)
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070515 Firefox/2.0.0.4
(In reply to comment #4)
> This is how ­ and ​ are rendered on my display.
Probably a problem with some fonts?
http://www.quirksmode.org/quirksmode.css uses "georgia,times,serif".
Your font doesn't look like georgia. Which font is used?
Please check your testcase in a build from, say, last week. I think you'll find that the soft hyphen changes I just landed were not responsible for this regression, that it happened earlier.
This is probably a bad font. We can work around it, but I'd like to verify that it's a font issue first.
> Your font doesn't look like georgia. Which font is used?
I created a simple HTML page with
"TestText​TestText​TestText​..."
and tried different font settings in Firefox Preferences.
Fonts are influencing the problem, however I see this problem with most of the
fonts.
With these fonts the problem remains, e.g.
Adobe Courier, Adobe Helvetica, Adobe Times, Arial, Georgia, cmr10,
SUSE Serif, Courier New, etc.
A few fonts don't show anything wrong: .e.g. Courier
With "Gnu Unifont", a small glyph saying "NUL" is displayed at the positions
of ​.
I tested the situation again with the binary release granparadiso/alpha5
(Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9a5) Gecko/20070605 GranParadiso/3.0a5):
It is as you expected: the problem with the squares at the 8203 positions is already visible in this version, and therefore does not seem to be related with the soft hyphen fix.
I tested it also with granparadiso/alpha1, and already here I see the small squares.
OK. Does anyone else see the problem with those fonts?
What version of Pango do you have?
No longer blocks: shy
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #9)
> What version of Pango do you have?
pango-1.8.1-4 SuSE Linux 9.3 (i586)
Comment 11•17 years ago
|
||
Comment 12•17 years ago
|
||
On OS X 10.4.10, ppc - and using the testcase mentioned in comment 8, I see what looks like a full space (U+0020) where the zero-width space is. This happens with most of the default OS X fonts, except Lucida Grande. That includes the MS fonts shipped with the OS (Arial, Trebuchet MS, Georgia, Times New Roman).
Some mono-space fonts work correctly: Monaco, Courier.
I can go back quite a long time - so far 'till the 20070524 Minefield build.
(I double checked the test file using the latest WebKit build and Opera 9.2 - both where correct for all fonts).
Comment 13•17 years ago
|
||
Attachment #270666 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•17 years ago
|
||
I compiled different versions of Pango and tested them with a current
build (changing LD_LIBRARY_PATH).
I get
broken "zero width space" display with Pango versions <= 1.10.4.
I get
correct "zero width space" display with Pango versions >= 1.12.0.
(tested with glib-2.12.12)
Firefox-2.0.0.4 always shows a correct display, independent of the
version of Pango (tested with 1.8.1, 1.10.4, 1.12.0).
Comment 15•17 years ago
|
||
Thanks for that information, p.ernst! I just thought I'd point out that per the (tentative) Linux runtime requirements for Firefox 3, we'll require versions of Pango 1.14.x and greater. http://wiki.mozilla.org/Linux/Runtime_Requirements
This should be fixed, even for old Pangos, by the patch I just checked in (associated with bug 385423).
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•17 years ago
|
Flags: in-testsuite?
Reporter | ||
Comment 17•17 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 18•17 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 19•17 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 20•17 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 21•17 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 22•17 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 23•17 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 24•17 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 25•17 years ago
|
||
Attachment #272475 -
Attachment mime type: application/octet-stream → text/plain
I'd make the container width little bigger, maybe 100em, just in case there are really bad fonts out there. Also the reference testcase is usually called "-ref.html". Other than that, these look good and could be put under layout/reftests/text. Thanks!
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•