Closed
Bug 389169
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
only show favicons in the url bar results if browser.chrome.site_icons is true
Categories
(Firefox :: Address Bar, defect)
Firefox
Address Bar
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INACTIVE
People
(Reporter: moco, Unassigned)
References
Details
only show favicons in the url bar results if browser.chrome.site_icons is true
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
when the pref is false, we'd want to pass in EmptyString() as the image when calling AppendMatch() in nsNavHistory.cpp
Additionally, to avoid a 16px x 16px blank spot, we need to pass EmptyString() as the (instead of "favicon") as the style when calling AppendMatch() in nsNavHistory.cpp
As an optimization, when the pref is false, we also don't need to do the JOIN with the moz_favicons table in nsNavHistory::CreateAutoCompleteQuery()
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
Question from a QA standpoint:
If we flip that pref mid-stream (say we've already got favicons populating both the URL bar's autocomplete dropdown as well as the Bookmarks Toolbar), would the behavior be to:
1. Just stop propagating new favicons?
or
2. Remove the already existing ones?
I'd imagine the former, but I'm writing the Litmus testcase, so I wanted to be sure.
Flags: in-litmus?
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
This WFM as option 1 above. After the config flip off, favicons from new sites visited are not shown in the URL bar nor in the autocomplete, they get the default blank paper icon. Pages with existing favicons don't show that favicon in the URL bar on page load, but the favicons do show up in autocomplete. That seems inconsistent.
Option 2 seems to be the correct method here. Show no favicon if the config is false.
Should this be WFM, WONTFIX or does work need to be done here?
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
removing in-litmus? until this is resolved, feel free to add it back at that
time.
Flags: in-litmus?
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
Per policy at https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bug_Triage/Projects/Bug_Handling/Bug_Husbandry#Inactive_Bugs. If this bug is not an enhancement request or a bug not present in a supported release of Firefox, then it may be reopened.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → INACTIVE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•