392182 - europe.nokia.com - Rendering regression on nokia website

Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE

(Tech Evangelism Graveyard :: English Other, defect)

Description

[Steve England [:stevee]]

Attachment: Shows expected and actual rendering

1. New profile, start firefox
2. Load URL
3. Observe the "Getting more out of your phone" section

Expected:
A List should be present to the right hand side of the image.

Actual:
List is partially visible to the right hand side of the title.

works: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9a2pre) Gecko/2007012602 Minefield/3.0a2pre
broken: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9a2pre) Gecko/2007012715 Minefield/3.0a2pre

Checkins to module PhoenixTinderbox between 2007-01-26 01:00 and 2007-01-27 16:00 :
http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=PhoenixTinderbox&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=&file=&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=explicit&mindate=2007-01-26+01&maxdate=2007-01-27+16&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot

CC'ng Mats because he's a clever chap.

Comment 1

[dolphinling]

Almost certainly inline-block, since that's specified on the list. Also, as near as I can tell, we're correct and they were just using inline-block stupidly.

There's a span with a position relative up and right, and inside that a ul with display inline-block. Before we did inline-block it was treated as a block, so it moved down below the image and the span's positioning moved it back up right next to the image. Now that we do have inline-block, though, it starts next to the image, and gets moved farther up and right.

So my guess is INVALID.

Comment 2

[Mats Palmgren (inactive)]

Attachment: Testcase

Comment 3

[Mats Palmgren (inactive)]

It was very likely caused by bug 9458 "Implement inline-block".
I agree with dolphinling's analysis.  If you increase the font slightly
(CTRL++) it jumps back down.  This is because it doesn't fit next to
the image in its original position so we do a line break (note the gap
under the image), and it ends up next to the image due to rel. offset...
weird, but I believe it's the correct layout...

-> Tech. Evang

Comment 4

[Chris Lawson (gone)]

INCOMPLETE due to lack of activity since the end of 2009.

If someone is willing to investigate the issues raised in this bug to determine whether they still exist, *and* work with the site in question to fix any existing issues, please feel free to re-open and assign to yourself.

Sorry for the bugspam; filter on "NO MORE PRE-2010 TE BUGS" to remove.