395415 - Create three new win32 VM for TRUNK/FF3 by copying win2k3sp2-ref-vm

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(mozilla.org Graveyard :: Server Operations, task)

Description

[John O'Duinn [:joduinn] (please use "needinfo?" flag)]

This will be used for Moz2 mercurial work. (Can you also add this to the
inventory so we can see it in VMI?)

Comment 1

[John O'Duinn [:joduinn] (please use "needinfo?" flag)]

corrected name of existing VM to copy from.

Comment 2

[John O'Duinn [:joduinn] (please use "needinfo?" flag)]

Actually, we need *three* VM copies created and added to VMI.

1) VM would be used for Moz2 mercurial work.
2) VM would be used for staging FF3/1.9/trunk cvs work.
3) VM would be used for production FF3/1.9/trunk cvs work.

Comment 3

[matthew zeier [:mrz]]

fx-win32-tbox needs to be shutdown to clone.  When can that happen?

Comment 4

[John O'Duinn [:joduinn] (please use "needinfo?" flag)]

Instead of shutting down fx-win32-tbox, you can clone direct-from-the-original-source, cloning from "win2k3sp2-ref-vm".


Can you please name these new VMs:
1) win32-moz2-slave1
2) win32-trunk-slave1
3) win32-trunk-slave2

Comment 5

[J. Paul Reed [:preed]]

(In reply to comment #4)

> Can you please name these new VMs:
> 1) win32-moz2-slave1
> 2) win32-trunk-slave1
> 3) win32-trunk-slave2

These names don't follow our naming conventions of $branch-$platform-$purpose. Is there a reason for changing the convention, or?

If not, can I suggest:

moz2-win32-slave1
fx-win32-slave1
fx-win32-slave2

?

Comment 6

[John O'Duinn [:joduinn] (please use "needinfo?" flag)]

Yes, using the names:

moz2-win32-slave1
fx-win32-slave1
fx-win32-slave2

...are fine. (We did talk about this yesterday, but only after I had commented above.)

Comment 7

[matthew zeier [:mrz]]

VMs are up @ 

moz2-win32-slave1.build.mozilla.org / 10.2.71.105
fx-win32-slave1.build.mozilla.org / 10.2.71.106
fx-win32-slave2.build.mozilla.org / 10.2.71.107