Closed
Bug 398066
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
Image requests should include image/* in Accept header
Categories
(Core :: Networking: HTTP, defect)
Core
Networking: HTTP
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla1.9beta3
People
(Reporter: u81239, Assigned: u81239)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
905 bytes,
patch
|
Biesinger
:
review+
pavlov
:
superreview+
damons
:
approval1.9+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
6.86 KB,
patch
|
dbaron
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; nl; rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; nl; rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7 If I have the following resource: /photo/3 And that resource has two representations: text/html image/jpg What I would like to do is, have the text/html version be this: <a href="2">Previous</a> | <a href="4">Next</a><br> <img src=""> So when I browse to a photo with the browser, it will show the HTML representation with navigation links, which then loads the JPEG representation inside it. Maybe also a title. If the Accept header for images had contained image/*, then this would have worked. However, currently, the HTML representation is chosen over the image, because both are part of */*. So I couldn’t get this to work. Sending the following accept header would be an improvement over the current one: Accept: image/png,image/*;q=0.8,*/*;q=0.5 I will attach a patch to this effect. By the way, maybe */*;q=0.5 should be removed? Or are there image types that don’t start with image/? ~Grauw Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to the URL http://www.grauw.nl/etc/tech/accept/sneeuw (a testcase) Actual Results: No image appears. If you view the HTTP request that are done, you’ll see the image’s request will get a response with the type text/html. Expected Results: An image of a snowy road should appear.
The patch that adds image/*;q=0.8 to the Accept header of image requests.
Attachment #282893 -
Flags: review?(darin.moz)
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #0) > By the way, maybe */*;q=0.5 should be removed? Or are there image types that > don’t start with image/? 'cos MNG used to be sent with video/x-mng (since it was animated)
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 282893 [details] [diff] [review] Include image/* in Accept header for image requests I'm not sure how active Darin is currently, I'm adding biesi as an additional reviewer.
Attachment #282893 -
Flags: review?(cbiesinger)
Updated•17 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Hardware: PC → All
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #282893 -
Flags: review?(cbiesinger) → review+
Updated•17 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → lholst
Version: unspecified → Trunk
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #282893 -
Flags: review?(darin.moz) → approval1.9?
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
Do we need any additional reviews on this before we approve?
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4) > Do we need any additional reviews on this before we approve? No, biesi's r= (and implied sr=) should be enough, as he has reviewed lots of libpr0n patches before, but if you all would like, I could request sr= from stuart or tor.
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #282893 -
Flags: superreview?(pavlov)
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #282893 -
Flags: superreview?(pavlov) → superreview+
Comment 6•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 282893 [details] [diff] [review] Include image/* in Accept header for image requests a1.9+=damons
Attachment #282893 -
Flags: approval1.9? → approval1.9+
Updated•17 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 7•17 years ago
|
||
Checking in modules/libpr0n/src/imgLoader.cpp; /cvsroot/mozilla/modules/libpr0n/src/imgLoader.cpp,v <-- imgLoader.cpp new revision: 1.95; previous revision: 1.94 done
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Keywords: checkin-needed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.9beta3
Comment 9•16 years ago
|
||
Review-pinging dbaron on this so he knows about the reftest change... Writing the binary data directly from the file is doable but difficult without relying on the exact working directory from which reftests are run, which I'd really rather not do, so I just inlined the data. It's basically an NxN green square; I don't remember exact dimensions.
Attachment #302520 -
Flags: review?(dbaron)
Comment on attachment 302520 [details] [diff] [review] Add test, add CGI support to reftest r=dbaron on the reftest.js change. Seems simple enough, although I'm sure the complexity lurks elsewhere.
Attachment #302520 -
Flags: review?(dbaron) → review+
Comment 11•16 years ago
|
||
Reftest and harness change checked in and passing.
Flags: in-testsuite? → in-testsuite+
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•