Closed
Bug 401041
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
extensions.ini hardcodes extensions path
Categories
(Toolkit :: Add-ons Manager, enhancement)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 344671
People
(Reporter: shorb, Unassigned)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.8) Gecko/20071008 Firefox/2.0.0.8
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.8) Gecko/20071008 Firefox/2.0.0.8
Here is a snip from my extensions.ini:
[ExtensionDirs]
Extension0=C:\Documents and Settings\steve\Application Data\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles\sm7vgomw.default\extensions\{d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d}
It should be like this instead:
[ExtensionDirs]
Extension0=C:\Documents and Settings\%USERNAME%\Application Data\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles\sm7vgomw.default\extensions\{d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d}
Note that "steve" should be replaced with the environment variable for the current username. In case I want to copy my entire windows profile to be used on another account name, the firefox extensions will load properly.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
If you copy such a profile, delete extensions.ini and its other extensions.* friends and let firefox rebuild those files automatically.
Using a relative path might not be a bad idea, using enviroment variables, otoh, might be. since it really doesn't gain anything except for your very small and pretty uncommon use case, for which there's a very easy workaround.
Severity: major → enhancement
Version: unspecified → 2.0 Branch
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
I really don't think its that uncommon. Many organizations use mandatory windows profiles (on a terminal server for example). On these mandatory profiles they have a custom firefox profile with several extensions installed.
I don't see any harm in using a relative path.
Thanks for replying.
Updated•17 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
The file itself auto-regenerates. If we were to implement something like this it would be relative to the actual Firefox profile as requested in bug 344671.
btw: there are files not that have are not part of the EM that contain paths and those files also auto-regenerate.
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Product: Firefox → Toolkit
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•