403221 - Fix typo: |explaination| -> |explanation|

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Core :: General, defect)

Description

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

Comment 1

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

Attachment: (Av1) </intl/uconv/util/ugen.c> [Checkin: Comment 12]

Comment 2

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

Attachment: (Bv1) </calendar/libical/src/libical/*> [Checkin: Comment 12]

Comment 3

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

Attachment: (Cv1) </security/manager/pki/resources/content/*>

Comment 4

[:Gavin Sharp [email: [e-mail]]]

You could have just attached these to bug 106386 (and the first two don't need review since they only touch comments).

Comment 5

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

Attachment: (Dv1) </webtools/testopia/tr_quicksearch.cgi> [Checkin: See comment 8]

Comment 6

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

Attachment: (Ev1) </java/webclient/src_moz/motif/*> [Checkin: Comment 12]

Comment 7

[Frédéric Buclin]

ghendricks, patch Dv1 affects Testopia. Do you want to check it in yourself?

Comment 8

[Greg Hendricks]

Thanks, I have applied it to the Testopia base.

Comment 9

[Kai Engert (:KaiE:)]

Comment on attachment 288021 [details] [diff] [review]
(Cv1) </security/manager/pki/resources/content/*>

I agree this patch is right. r=kengert on the assumption you have verified that all uses of this string ID are updated (I have not checked that).

Comment 10

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

Attachment: (Cv1a) </security/manager/pki/resources/content/*> [Checkin: Comment 12]

Cv1, with added space after comma(s).
(Sorry, I didn't notice before.)

Comment 11

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

(In reply to comment #9)
> on the assumption you have verified that
> all uses of this string ID are updated (I have not checked that).

Yes, see the URL for this bug ... I've submitted patches for all occurrences.

Comment 12

[Reed Loden [:reed]]

Checking in java/webclient/src_moz/motif/BrowserControlNativeShimStub.cpp;
/cvsroot/mozilla/java/webclient/src_moz/motif/BrowserControlNativeShimStub.cpp,v  <--  BrowserControlNativeShimStub.cpp
new revision: 1.4; previous revision: 1.3
done
Checking in java/webclient/src_moz/motif/MotifBrowserControlCanvasStub.cpp;
/cvsroot/mozilla/java/webclient/src_moz/motif/MotifBrowserControlCanvasStub.cpp,v  <--  MotifBrowserControlCanvasStub.cpp
new revision: 1.5; previous revision: 1.4
done
Checking in java/webclient/src_moz/motif/NativeLoaderStub.cpp;
/cvsroot/mozilla/java/webclient/src_moz/motif/NativeLoaderStub.cpp,v  <--  NativeLoaderStub.cpp
new revision: 1.13; previous revision: 1.12
done
Checking in intl/uconv/util/ugen.c;
/cvsroot/mozilla/intl/uconv/util/ugen.c,v  <--  ugen.c
new revision: 1.24; previous revision: 1.23
done
Checking in calendar/libical/src/libical/icalrecur.h;
/cvsroot/mozilla/calendar/libical/src/libical/icalrecur.h,v  <--  icalrecur.h
new revision: 1.2; previous revision: 1.1
done
Checking in calendar/libical/src/libical/autogenex/ical.h;
/cvsroot/mozilla/calendar/libical/src/libical/autogenex/ical.h,v  <--  ical.h
new revision: 1.3; previous revision: 1.2
done
Checking in security/manager/pki/resources/content/editcerts.js;
/cvsroot/mozilla/security/manager/pki/resources/content/editcerts.js,v  <--  editcerts.js
new revision: 1.17; previous revision: 1.16
done
Checking in security/manager/pki/resources/content/editemailcert.xul;
/cvsroot/mozilla/security/manager/pki/resources/content/editemailcert.xul,v  <--  editemailcert.xul
new revision: 1.6; previous revision: 1.5
done
Checking in security/manager/pki/resources/content/editsslcert.xul;
/cvsroot/mozilla/security/manager/pki/resources/content/editsslcert.xul,v  <--  editsslcert.xul
new revision: 1.17; previous revision: 1.16
done

Comment 13

[Simon Paquet [:sipaq]]

It's fine if you don't seek review for such tree-wide changes from the respective module owner. 

But it's not fine, if you change files within a module, without at least informing the module owner (Daniel Boelzle for Calendar) or one of the main developers.

I find it unfortunate that I had to learn about this bug from looking at the checkin comments.

Comment 14

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

[Off topic]

(In reply to comment #4)
> (and the first two don't need review since they only touch comments).

(In reply to comment #13)
> it's not fine, if you change files within a module, without at least 

My review requests would have let people know ... Sorry.

[Off topic]

Comment 15

[:Gavin Sharp [email: [e-mail]]]

Sorry, I wasn't aware that the calendar project wanted to be notified of comment only typo fixes. They should probably make that known in bug 106386, which has changed calendar files in the past.

Comment 16

[Simon Paquet [:sipaq]]

Gavin, we want to know for two reasons:

1. We currently implement a strict mirror policy between trunk and the 1.8 branch, 
   for Calendar code meaning that all changes have to land on both the trunk and 
   the branch to keep them in sync.
2. The libical that the patch touched here is not our own code, we just regularly 
   sync with upstream and any diversions from upstream make merging harder for us.

Comment 17

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

(Simon, feel free to either request branch approval or revert this patch, if either suits your project.)

Comment 18

[Simon Paquet [:sipaq]]

I already committed the changes to Calendar files to the 1.8 branch. Branch approval is not needed for files in mozilla/calendar.