push mini winxp boxes to production/push winxp blades to stage

RESOLVED FIXED

Status

RESOLVED FIXED
11 years ago
6 years ago

People

(Reporter: anodelman, Assigned: anodelman)

Tracking

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

Attachments

(1 attachment, 1 obsolete attachment)

(Assignee)

Description

11 years ago
The mini winxp boxes are reporting stable numbers and I believe are ready to replace the (flaky) blade machines.

See the mini winxp boxes reporting here:
http://graphs-stage.mozilla.org/#spst=range&spstart=1187961037&spend=1195516084&bpst=cursor&bpstart=1187961037&bpend=1195516084&m1tid=204&m1bl=0&m1avg=0&m2tid=14699&m2bl=0&m2avg=0&m3tid=93414&m3bl=0&m3avg=0&m4tid=93469&m4bl=0&m4avg=0

The only missing component is to force cycle collection between each page load, which is pending in another patch (bug 403835).  I don't believe that that should delay pushing these to production, since they meet the initial specification for what we wanted production machines to look like.
(Assignee)

Comment 1

11 years ago
Created attachment 289522 [details] [diff] [review]
push mini winxps to production/demote blade winxps to stage
Assignee: nobody → anodelman
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #289522 - Flags: superreview?(pavlov)
Attachment #289522 - Flags: review?(rcampbell)
(Assignee)

Comment 2

11 years ago
Created attachment 289538 [details] [diff] [review]
push mini winxps to production/demote blade winxps to stage #2

Forgot to use the new production configs on the mini winxp machines - otherwise the same patch as before.
Attachment #289522 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #289538 - Flags: superreview?(pavlov)
Attachment #289538 - Flags: review?(rcampbell)
Attachment #289522 - Flags: superreview?(pavlov)
Attachment #289522 - Flags: review?(rcampbell)
Comment on attachment 289538 [details] [diff] [review]
push mini winxps to production/demote blade winxps to stage #2

Maybe we should turn on tsvg on the newly-moved blades to see how it runs there? Otherwise, a++. This looks good to go.
Attachment #289538 - Flags: review?(rcampbell) → review+

Comment 4

11 years ago
Comment on attachment 289538 [details] [diff] [review]
push mini winxps to production/demote blade winxps to stage #2

i don't really understand most of this stuff, but it looks ok to me
Attachment #289538 - Flags: superreview?(pavlov) → superreview+
(Assignee)

Comment 5

11 years ago
Checking in master.cfg;
/cvsroot/mozilla/tools/buildbot-configs/testing/talos/perfmaster/master.cfg,v  <--  master.cfg
new revision: 1.21; previous revision: 1.20
done
Checking in configs/config-win32-pxp.py;
/cvsroot/mozilla/tools/buildbot-configs/testing/talos/perfmaster/configs/config-win32-pxp.py,v  <--  config-win32-pxp.py
new revision: 1.2; previous revision: 1.1
done
RCS file: /cvsroot/mozilla/tools/buildbot-configs/testing/talos/perfmaster/configs/production.sample.config,v
done
Checking in configs/production.sample.config;
/cvsroot/mozilla/tools/buildbot-configs/testing/talos/perfmaster/configs/production.sample.config,v  <--  production.sample.config
initial revision: 1.1
done
RCS file: /cvsroot/mozilla/tools/buildbot-configs/testing/talos/perfmaster/configs/production.sample.config.nogfx,v
done
Checking in configs/production.sample.config.nogfx;
/cvsroot/mozilla/tools/buildbot-configs/testing/talos/perfmaster/configs/production.sample.config.nogfx,v  <--  production.sample.config.nogfx
initial revision: 1.1
done
(Assignee)

Updated

11 years ago
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Mass move of Core:Testing bugs to mozilla.org:ReleaseEngineering. Filter on RelEngMassMove to ignore.
Component: Testing → Release Engineering
Product: Core → mozilla.org
QA Contact: testing → release
Version: unspecified → other
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.