Closed
Bug 405572
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
Offer alternative UUID format for CID
Categories
(Webtools Graveyard :: Mozbot, enhancement, P1)
Webtools Graveyard
Mozbot
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
2.6
People
(Reporter: u278084, Assigned: u278084)
Details
(Whiteboard: [has-patch])
Attachments
(1 file, 2 obsolete files)
1.99 KB,
patch
|
wolf
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Some developers, especially those new to Mozilla development, don't immediately pick up the connection between :
065dca73-3761-4dbc-a831-a2ebbcc536cb
and
{0x065dca73, 0x3761, 0x4dbc, {0xa8, 0x31, 0xa2, 0xeb, 0xbc, 0xc5, 0x36, 0xcb}}
And they don't like to do the conversion. So attached is something to output UUID and CID in the same line when someone asks for a uuid. Maybe this should be put into it's own module/command? like |mozbot : cid|?
Yes my perl is rather sketchy.
Updated•16 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [has-attachment]
Updated•16 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P1
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #290338 -
Flags: review?(bugtrap)
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 290338 [details] [diff] [review]
first attempt
Thanks for the work on this. Code-wise things look good, don't see any problems there.
UI-wise though:
Yeah, it should be implemented as a seperate command, cid is a good name for it, imo
Addtionally, to help with discoverability, it'd be nice to have a short msg appended to the current uuid output that just says something like "/msg $botnick cid for cid form."
Attachment #290338 -
Flags: review?(bugtrap) → review-
CID is now it's own command. As well, there is a section in the help subroutine for it. Not asking for review until I get a clarification about whether we can actually get the bot name (it seems to be hardcoded in other places).
Attachment #290338 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
As if on cue. yes, it is possible. Uploading fixed version.
Attachment #348298 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #348301 -
Flags: review?(bugtrap)
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 348301 [details] [diff] [review]
Third patch is the charm
Looks good to me. :-)
You want to check it in or would you prefer me to?
Attachment #348301 -
Flags: review?(bugtrap) → review+
(In reply to comment #4)
> You want to check it in or would you prefer me to?
If you can, that will be swell.
Comment 6•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #5)
> If you can, that will be swell.
No problem. :-)
Whiteboard: [has-attachment] → [has-patch]
Comment 7•16 years ago
|
||
Checking in BotModules/UUIDGen.bm;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/mozbot/BotModules/UUIDGen.bm,v <-- UUIDGen.bm
new revision: 2.1; previous revision: 2.0
done
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•16 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → 2.6
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Webtools → Webtools Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•