409123 - Printing does not pass ACID2 test.

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 409117

(Core :: Printing: Output, defect)

Description

[Masahiro YAMADA]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9b3pre) Gecko/2007121905 Minefield/3.0b3pre
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9b3pre) Gecko/2007121905 Minefield/3.0b3pre

Printing ACID2 test does not pass ACID2 test.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Go to ACID2 test
2.Print It
3.Check difference of Result of Printing and Displaying 
Actual Results:  
It should be same face.

Expected Results:  
It does not same.

Trouble exists on 
Rows 4-5:left border of face sould black but it is yellow.
Rows 10-11: span (upper half of smile) : it should be black, but it is white.

Comment 1

[Masahiro YAMADA]

Attachment: Printed image (Using Microsoft Office Document Image Writer)

Comment 2

[-fullmetaljacket-]

can you please retest using acid2 test hosted at hixie's site
http://www.hixie.ch/tests/evil/acid/002/

Comment 3

[Masahiro YAMADA]

(In reply to comment #2)
> can you please retest using acid2 test hosted at hixie's site
> http://www.hixie.ch/tests/evil/acid/002/
> 
Attachment 293990 [details] is result of printing his site.
Dislayed result is correct. But Printed result is not correct.

Comment 4

[Frank Wein [:mcsmurf]]

xref: Bug 409117

Comment 5

[Wayne Mery (:wsmwk)]

reporter, does this still fail when using Firefox 5 *beta* http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/channel/ or Firefox 4?

Comment 6

[Masahiro YAMADA]

Attachment: XPS print result by http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/7d2a3d61a377

(In reply to comment #5)
> reporter, does this still fail when using Firefox 5 *beta*
> http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/channel/ or Firefox 4?

Still reproduced with trunk build from http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/7d2a3d61a377
Attachment file is result of print by Microsoft XPS Document Writer

Comment 7

[Phoenix]

Output from Printing is same as in Print Preview, so this is definitely dupe