Closed
Bug 411854
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
directory list should use localized ellipsis
Categories
(Core :: Internationalization, defect)
Core
Internationalization
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: masa141421356, Assigned: masa141421356)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
3.90 KB,
patch
|
masa141421356
:
review+
beltzner
:
approval1.9+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9b3pre) Gecko/2008011005 Minefield/3.0b3pre Build Identifier: spun off from Bug 403484 Comment 47. See http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsblame.cgi?file=/mozilla/netwerk/streamconv/converters/nsIndexedToHTML.cpp&rev=1.88#828 It uses "…" and it is hard coded. I think it should be replaced as HTML escaped localized ellipsis. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Change intl.ellipsis in about:config. 2.Show directory list that contains file that has very long name. 3. Actual Results: Ellipsis is always U+2026. Expected Results: Ellipsis should be loczlized. Simple proposal: - escapedShort.AppendLiteral("…"); + AppendNonAsciiToNCR(nsContentUtils::GetLocalizedEllipsis(), escapedShort); # It may be needed to add including nsContentUtils.h
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Version: unspecified → Trunk
Updated•17 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → smontagu
Severity: trivial → minor
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: File Handling → Internationalization
Ever confirmed: true
QA Contact: file-handling → i18n
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
Masahiro, would you be willing to take this bug and provide a real patch ? (reassign to yourself if so)
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1) > Masahiro, would you be willing to take this bug and provide a real patch ? > > (reassign to yourself if so) > I'll write patch. But I found other bugs for same source file. I think one of them are more important. Patch for this bug conflicts to it.
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
I thought I can use nsContentUtils::GetLocalizedEllipsis() to get intl.ellipsis. But, [#include "nsContentUtils.h"] causes failure of compile. (complier failed to find 'nsContentUtils.h'). Which is better to modify makefile or to implement without nsContentUtils::GetLocalizedEllipsis() ?
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
Whom souhld I request review ? And is it needed superreview and ui-review ?
Attachment #300848 -
Flags: review?
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #300848 -
Flags: review? → review?(mano)
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
Yamada-san: FYI: you can find the reviewers for each modules from CVS log of LXR.
Comment 6•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 300848 [details] [diff] [review] Patch rv.1.0 I'm not a necko peer
Attachment #300848 -
Flags: review?(mano)
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #300848 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Comment 7•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 300848 [details] [diff] [review] Patch rv.1.0 Make that mEscapedEllipsis, and looks ok. Thank you for fixing this!
Attachment #300848 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky) → review+
Comment 8•16 years ago
|
||
What are we waiting for here?
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•16 years ago
|
||
Is superreview and ui-review needed for attachment 300348 [details] ?
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #9) > Is superreview and ui-review needed for attachment 300348 [details] ? > Oops, it's attachment 300848 [details] [diff] [review].
Comment 11•16 years ago
|
||
No ui-review needed. Boris does superreviews, and he usually does it along with the review, so I guess it's kind of redundant.
Comment 12•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #7) > (From update of attachment 300848 [details] [diff] [review]) > Make that mEscapedEllipsis Masahiro, can you please make that change, attach a new patch and request approval1.9?
Updated•16 years ago
|
Assignee: smontagu → masa141421356
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•16 years ago
|
||
renamed escapedEllipsis to mEscapedEllipsis
Attachment #300848 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #314547 -
Flags: review+
Attachment #314547 -
Flags: approval1.9?
Comment 14•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 314547 [details] [diff] [review] Patch rev.1.1 a1.9=beltzner
Attachment #314547 -
Flags: approval1.9? → approval1.9+
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 15•16 years ago
|
||
checked-in, thank you for your work!
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•16 years ago
|
||
verified at Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9pre) Gecko/2008041005 Minefield/3.0pre
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•