Closed
Bug 413016
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
"ASSERTION: SVG frame expected" with svg:after in SVG document
Categories
(Core :: SVG, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: jruderman, Assigned: longsonr)
References
Details
(Keywords: assertion, testcase, Whiteboard: [missed 1.9 checkin])
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
109 bytes,
image/svg+xml
|
Details |
This is similar to bug 409461. I think the main difference is that the <svg> element here is the document root rather than being inside an HTML document.
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
nsCSSFrameConstructor::ConstructDocElementFrame needs to not allow before/after content in the SVG case.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
FWIW,although there are other calls to ProcessChildren it doesn't look as if SVG content ought to be able to get there and if it does it should be patched in some other way, avoiding the code path altogether.
Assignee: nobody → longsonr
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #297928 -
Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #297928 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #297928 -
Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #297928 -
Flags: superreview+
Attachment #297928 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #297928 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #297928 -
Flags: approval1.9?
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #297928 -
Flags: approval1.9? → approval1.9+
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
Checked in, then backed out. Possibly caused problems on qm-mini-ubuntu05.
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
Was this bug the cause Robert? Should we re-request approval for it?
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
I could try checking it in again. It was one of 2 check ins at the time.
Comment 6•16 years ago
|
||
You could try it on the try server first: http://wiki.mozilla.org/Build:TryServer
Updated•16 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [missed 1.9 checkin]
Comment 7•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 297928 [details] [diff] [review] patch Removing approval since this missed the 1.9 cutoff.
Attachment #297928 -
Flags: approval1.9+
Comment 8•16 years ago
|
||
Robert, time to land this on Hg?
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•16 years ago
|
||
IMHO it needs a green tree to land and a reasonable chance of not getting subsequent spurious oranges. Seems difficult currently. Feel free to land it if you wish and you get to it before I do but be prepared to back it out again if necessary.
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•16 years ago
|
||
This bug is now WFM, but I don't think longsonr's patch has been checked in...
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•16 years ago
|
||
Fixed by 473390 if not before.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #297928 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•