Closed
Bug 414546
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
undefined symbol: pango_font_describe_with_absolute_size
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: GFX, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 414239
People
(Reporter: zwnj, Unassigned)
References
Details
OS: Ubuntu Dapper (6.06)
Machine AMD 64
Pango: version 1.12.3-0ubuntu3
Latest nightly (2008-01-29) crashes, making this error:
/opt/firefox-3.0-nightly/firefox-bin: symbol lookup error: /opt/firefox-3.0-nightly/libxul.so: undefined symbol: pango_font_describe_with_absolute_size
Linux/Runtime Requirements - MozillaWiki
These requirements may change over time, based on how the platform evolves. ... pango-1.14.9-3.el5.centos.i386.rpm; pango-devel-1.14.9-3.el5.centos.i386.rpm ...
http://wiki.mozilla.org/Linux/Runtime_Requirements
The requirements clearly say 1.14.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Updated•17 years ago
|
Component: OS Integration → GFX
Product: Firefox → Core
QA Contact: os.integration → general
Version: unspecified → Trunk
OK, so the runtime requirements have changed and now require a Linux install equivalent to CentOS 5, which was released in April 2007. That's equivalent to only supporting Vista on the Windows platform. Fine, I understand desktop Linux was in a bad state.
Will some error handling be added so that people who have installed firefox as a binary (not through RPMs) don't crash horribly when they do the major update to Firefox 3?
Or will that major update not be offered on Linux?
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3)
> OK, so the runtime requirements have changed and now require a Linux install
> equivalent to CentOS 5, which was released in April 2007. That's equivalent to
> only supporting Vista on the Windows platform. Fine, I understand desktop
> Linux was in a bad state.
Except that Vista is not free. And most Linux distros don't have long term support. If you still run Fedora 2, there's something seriously broken about your system anyway.
Desktop Linux was not in bad state. Just that Linux distros make releases every 6 month or so. No need to support 5 years worth of releases back.
> Will some error handling be added so that people who have installed firefox as
> a binary (not through RPMs) don't crash horribly when they do the major update
> to Firefox 3?
>
> Or will that major update not be offered on Linux?
>
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
But wait, where do we call that function? LXR doesn't find any callers for me.
Updated•17 years ago
|
Resolution: INVALID → DUPLICATE
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•