Closed Bug 416270 Opened 17 years ago Closed 13 years ago

[10.5] dmg icon should include a 512x512 version

Categories

(Camino Graveyard :: General, enhancement)

All
macOS
enhancement
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: alqahira, Assigned: phiw2)

Details

(Whiteboard: [camino-2.1.2][camino-2.1.3])

Attachments

(5 files, 2 obsolete files)

I don't know that people will see it that often, so it's not critical, but the other kids are doing it, and we should, too, at some point.
Yeah, I think I can do this... I'll reassign if not.
Assignee: nobody → samuel.sidler
Taking, hoping Sam will not be real mad angry at me…
Assignee: samuel.sidler+old → phiw
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Hardware: PowerPC → All
Attached file updated icns file
With 512x512, 256x256, 128x128, 32x32 and 16x16 icons All generated from optimized png's for the individual icons I've included a 256x256 icon here, although: 1. the default blank icns file shipped by OS X 10.6+ does not include a 256x256 icon) 2. 10.6+ rarely make use of this image. The preview in Finder windows in Column view maxes out at 256x256 (10.7) / 128x128 (10.6). 10.7 uses the 512x512 icon for the larger view, I haven't been able to see it use the 256x256 icon (with a custom made file…). In Icon view the 256x256 icon is used. Mounted on the desktop, the icon size is capped at 128x128. But given the persistent rumors of highDPI screens / machines coming, it might not be a bad idea to include it (I assume Apple will use the same trick as on iOS: @x2 - I noticed that the Xcode 4.2 Icon Composer offers an option to include a 1024x1024 icon… Afaict, none of the icns file shipping with 10.7.3 include an icon that size, though - I only found one Apple app that has such a beast: Launchpad).
Attachment #601894 - Flags: review?(alqahira)
Screenshot of the individual icons seen in Icon Composer.
As an alternative, the icns file without 256x256 icon. The file is 35Kb smaller.
Comment on attachment 601894 [details] updated icns file r=ardissone Both look fine; I'll let Stuart make the call on whether having the 256x256 member is worth the 35K.
Attachment #601894 - Flags: review?(alqahira) → review+
Attachment #601894 - Flags: superreview?(stuart.morgan+bugzilla)
Comment on attachment 601894 [details] updated icns file I vote no on the 256; if it's rarely used, let's just let interpolation handle it.
Attachment #601894 - Flags: superreview?(stuart.morgan+bugzilla) → superreview+
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [camino-2.1.2]
Attachment #601896 - Attachment description: alt updated icns file → alt updated icns file [landed]
Attached image Color shift
So, I noticed when I mounted 2.1.2rc on my Desktop that the .dmg icon color appeared to have shifted some, and, sure enough, it appears to be more aqua than the old icon. (Also, the edges aren't quite as smooth.) I don't know how I didn't catch either of those when I was reviewing :-(
Attached file icns file v2 (obsolete) —
(In reply to Smokey Ardisson (not following bugs - do not email) from comment #9) > So, I noticed when I mounted 2.1.2rc on my Desktop that the .dmg icon color > appeared to have shifted some, and, sure enough, it appears to be more aqua > than the old icon. (Also, the edges aren't quite as smooth.) 1. the default (blank) dmg icons as shipped by Apple are apparently generated from the largest image (this goes back all the way to 10.5 at least). Those jaggy edges are only really visible on flat light coloured backgrounds, btw. 10.3.9 to the rescue! I fetched the 128x128 and 32x32 images from that .icns file… 2. colour shift: I've no idea what happened :-(. Hopefully the attached .icns file looks ok on someone else system.
Attachment #604818 - Flags: review?(alqahira)
Attached file icns file v2b (obsolete) —
with a minor tweak to the 32px icon
Attachment #604818 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #604837 - Flags: review?(alqahira)
Attachment #604818 - Flags: review?(alqahira)
Attached file icns file v2c
with more slight tweaks to the 32px icon
Attachment #604837 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #604840 - Flags: review?(alqahira)
Attachment #604837 - Flags: review?(alqahira)
Comment on attachment 604840 [details] icns file v2c This seems to be the best compromise between icon position and color fidelity on the 32x32 icon (with no color shift), and smoothes out the jagged edges on both sizes in question. I'm not sure whether I'm sorry I didn't catch this before or not; it seems like either way there's been a lot of hair pulled to get here :(
Attachment #604840 - Flags: review?(alqahira) → review+
Attachment #604840 - Flags: superreview?(stuart.morgan+bugzilla)
Comment on attachment 604840 [details] icns file v2c sr=smorga
Attachment #604840 - Flags: superreview?(stuart.morgan+bugzilla) → superreview+
Whiteboard: [camino-2.1.2] → [camino-2.1.2][camino-2.1.3]
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: