Closed
Bug 418371
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
implement the rest of methods of nsIAccessibleTable on xul:listbox
Categories
(Core :: Disability Access APIs, defect)
Core
Disability Access APIs
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: surkov, Assigned: surkov)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
26.21 KB,
patch
|
evan.yan
:
review+
beltzner
:
approval1.9+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
implement the rest of methods of nsIAccessibleTable on xul:listbox
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
Attachment #306223 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #306262 -
Flags: review?(Evan.Yan)
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment on attachment 306262 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
>+ nsCOMPtr<nsIDOMXULMultiSelectControlElement> control =
>+ do_QueryInterface(mDOMNode);
>+ NS_ASSERTION(control,
>+ "Doesn't implement nsIDOMXULMultiSelectControlElement.");
If it's a single selection list, could it still be QI to multiSelectContrlEl?
We can implement GetColumnHeader/GetRowHeader as well, and add testcases for <listheader>.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3)
> (From update of attachment 306262 [details] [diff] [review])
> >+ nsCOMPtr<nsIDOMXULMultiSelectControlElement> control =
> >+ do_QueryInterface(mDOMNode);
> >+ NS_ASSERTION(control,
> >+ "Doesn't implement nsIDOMXULMultiSelectControlElement.");
>
> If it's a single selection list, could it still be QI to multiSelectContrlEl?
It's implemented by XBL, so it's exposed always.
> We can implement GetColumnHeader/GetRowHeader as well, and add testcases for
> <listheader>.
>
It would require a lot additional code because header should implement nsIAccessibleTable like header of xul:tree does. I like to deal with this in another bug.
Attachment #306262 -
Flags: review?(Evan.Yan) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #306262 -
Flags: approval1.9?
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 306262 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
a1.9=beltzner
Attachment #306262 -
Flags: approval1.9? → approval1.9+
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•17 years ago
|
||
checked in
/cvsroot/mozilla/accessible/src/base/nsAccessibilityAtomList.h,v <-- nsAccessibilityAtomList.h
new revision: 1.87; previous revision: 1.86
done
Checking in accessible/src/xul/nsXULSelectAccessible.cpp;
/cvsroot/mozilla/accessible/src/xul/nsXULSelectAccessible.cpp,v <-- nsXULSelectAccessible.cpp
new revision: 1.56; previous revision: 1.55
done
Checking in accessible/tests/mochitest/Makefile.in;
/cvsroot/mozilla/accessible/tests/mochitest/Makefile.in,v <-- Makefile.in
new revision: 1.6; previous revision: 1.5
done
RCS file: /cvsroot/mozilla/accessible/tests/mochitest/test_nsIAccessibleTable_listboxes.xul,v
done
Checking in accessible/tests/mochitest/test_nsIAccessibleTable_listboxes.xul;
/cvsroot/mozilla/accessible/tests/mochitest/test_nsIAccessibleTable_listboxes.xul,v <-- test_nsIAccessibleTable_listboxes.xul
initial revision: 1.1
done
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•