Closed
Bug 418371
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
implement the rest of methods of nsIAccessibleTable on xul:listbox
Categories
(Core :: Disability Access APIs, defect)
Core
Disability Access APIs
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: surkov, Assigned: surkov)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
26.21 KB,
patch
|
evan.yan
:
review+
beltzner
:
approval1.9+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
implement the rest of methods of nsIAccessibleTable on xul:listbox
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
Attachment #306223 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #306262 -
Flags: review?(Evan.Yan)
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment on attachment 306262 [details] [diff] [review] patch >+ nsCOMPtr<nsIDOMXULMultiSelectControlElement> control = >+ do_QueryInterface(mDOMNode); >+ NS_ASSERTION(control, >+ "Doesn't implement nsIDOMXULMultiSelectControlElement."); If it's a single selection list, could it still be QI to multiSelectContrlEl? We can implement GetColumnHeader/GetRowHeader as well, and add testcases for <listheader>.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3) > (From update of attachment 306262 [details] [diff] [review]) > >+ nsCOMPtr<nsIDOMXULMultiSelectControlElement> control = > >+ do_QueryInterface(mDOMNode); > >+ NS_ASSERTION(control, > >+ "Doesn't implement nsIDOMXULMultiSelectControlElement."); > > If it's a single selection list, could it still be QI to multiSelectContrlEl? It's implemented by XBL, so it's exposed always. > We can implement GetColumnHeader/GetRowHeader as well, and add testcases for > <listheader>. > It would require a lot additional code because header should implement nsIAccessibleTable like header of xul:tree does. I like to deal with this in another bug.
Attachment #306262 -
Flags: review?(Evan.Yan) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #306262 -
Flags: approval1.9?
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 306262 [details] [diff] [review] patch a1.9=beltzner
Attachment #306262 -
Flags: approval1.9? → approval1.9+
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•17 years ago
|
||
checked in /cvsroot/mozilla/accessible/src/base/nsAccessibilityAtomList.h,v <-- nsAccessibilityAtomList.h new revision: 1.87; previous revision: 1.86 done Checking in accessible/src/xul/nsXULSelectAccessible.cpp; /cvsroot/mozilla/accessible/src/xul/nsXULSelectAccessible.cpp,v <-- nsXULSelectAccessible.cpp new revision: 1.56; previous revision: 1.55 done Checking in accessible/tests/mochitest/Makefile.in; /cvsroot/mozilla/accessible/tests/mochitest/Makefile.in,v <-- Makefile.in new revision: 1.6; previous revision: 1.5 done RCS file: /cvsroot/mozilla/accessible/tests/mochitest/test_nsIAccessibleTable_listboxes.xul,v done Checking in accessible/tests/mochitest/test_nsIAccessibleTable_listboxes.xul; /cvsroot/mozilla/accessible/tests/mochitest/test_nsIAccessibleTable_listboxes.xul,v <-- test_nsIAccessibleTable_listboxes.xul initial revision: 1.1 done
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•