Closed
Bug 418687
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
no way to pass linker flags to NSPR's DLL linking
Categories
(NSPR :: NSPR, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
4.7.1
People
(Reporter: ted, Assigned: ted)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 2 obsolete files)
I'm trying to fix bug 415928. When we build our own CRT from the Microsoft sources, we currently still need to tell the linker not to add a manifest requiring the Microsoft CRT. We can do this by passing -MANIFEST:NO to the linker. Unfortunately, I don't see any way to pass this to the NSPR DLL link line. Both DLLFLAGS and OS_DLLFLAGS are assigned unconditionally in configure, and that link line doesn't use LDFLAGS at all.
I think it would be simple to make DLLFLAGS work like CFLAGS/LDFLAGS, and accept an initial value from the environment.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
This makes DLLFLAGS work similarly to CFLAGS etc.
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 304617 [details] [diff] [review]
allow passing DLLFLAGS from environment
Ted, if DLLFLAGS is not a commonly used makefile
variable, does it make sense to use LDFLAGS as the
external interface for both Unix and Windows? That is:
@@ -89,10 +89,11 @@
dnl =
dnl ========================================================
CFLAGS="${CFLAGS=}"
CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS=}"
LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS=}"
+DLLFLAGS="${LDFLAGS=}"
HOST_CFLAGS="${HOST_CFLAGS=}"
HOST_LDFLAGS="${HOST_LDFLAGS=}"
case "$target" in
*-cygwin*|*-mingw*)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
That would be fine with me. I just want some way to get extra linker options into NSPR.
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
Ted, it seems that LDFLAGS is the name of this variable in your (Mozilla's) makefiles, right?
If so, I'll use LDFLAGS.
How urgent is this patch?
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
I would like to get this in for beta 4, so I can fix bug 415928. The code freeze for that is Tuesday night (Februrary 26th). Right now we're shipping both our custom-built CRT and the Microsoft CRT DLLs. With this patch and one more patch in that bug, we'll be able to ship just our custom CRT.
Thanks!
Comment 6•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 304617 [details] [diff] [review]
allow passing DLLFLAGS from environment
r=wtc.
Attachment #304617 -
Flags: review?(wtc) → review+
Comment 7•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 304617 [details] [diff] [review]
allow passing DLLFLAGS from environment
a=beltzner
Attachment #304617 -
Flags: approval1.9+
Comment 8•17 years ago
|
||
I edited Ted's patch and checked it in on the NSPR
trunk for NSPR 4.7.1.
Checking in configure;
/cvsroot/mozilla/nsprpub/configure,v <-- configure
new revision: 1.225; previous revision: 1.224
done
Checking in configure.in;
/cvsroot/mozilla/nsprpub/configure.in,v <-- configure.in
new revision: 1.228; previous revision: 1.227
done
Attachment #304617 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 9•17 years ago
|
||
Ted, you need to pass LDFLAGS (rather than DLLFLAGS) in
the environment to NSPR's configure script. Hopefully
this is closer to the standard usage.
Kai Engert will update the NSPR tag in mozilla/client.mk
later today.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → 4.7.1
Comment 10•17 years ago
|
||
Sigh, we use LDFLAGS when building a utility program now.c,
so I still need to use DLLFLAGS.
Checking in configure;
/cvsroot/mozilla/nsprpub/configure,v <-- configure
new revision: 1.226; previous revision: 1.225
done
Checking in configure.in;
/cvsroot/mozilla/nsprpub/configure.in,v <-- configure.in
new revision: 1.229; previous revision: 1.228
done
Attachment #304865 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 11•16 years ago
|
||
I accidentally checked in with this bug number for bug 481687
If anyone folows the pushlog link, it's for that bug. :)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•