In bug 418772, Ted says > Did your changes remove all of the preprocessor stuff? Could this become a > normal .py file instead of a .py.in now? And it's a good question. Unfortunately, getting relative imports to work with a mix of preprocessed and unpreprocessed files is tricky. We'll need to figure that out, or adjust the module search path somehow.
Moving a bunch of Core :: Testing bugs to Testing :: Mochitest to clear out the former, which is obsolete now that we have more specialized categories for such bugs; filter on the string "MochitestMmMm" to delete all these notifications.
Component: Testing → Mochitest
Product: Core → Testing
QA Contact: testing → mochitest
Note that I worked around this with runreftest.py by just $(INSTALL)ing the script to _tests/reftest in the objdir, alongside automation.py. runreftest.py is not preprocessed, as it relies on automation.py for all that dirty work.
bug 576026 fixed runtests.py.
Summary: runtests.py.in and profileserver.py.in shouldn't need to be preprocessed. → profileserver.py.in shouldn't need to be preprocessed.
Comment on attachment 492635 [details] [diff] [review] Removed profileserver.py from being preprocessed. r=me, but we should probably fix this the same way as bug 614863 gets fixed to avoid problems.
Attachment #492635 - Flags: review?(ted.mielczarek) → review+
(In reply to comment #5) > Comment on attachment 492635 [details] [diff] [review] > Removed profileserver.py from being preprocessed. > > r=me, but we should probably fix this the same way as bug 614863 gets fixed to > avoid problems. I just advocated for 614863 to be wontfix. do you have any suggestions/ideas on how to fix that issue easily?
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla2.0b11
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.