Closed Bug 423587 Opened 17 years ago Closed 1 year ago

Extension Manager should support parental controls file blocking flags

Categories

(Core Graveyard :: Installer: XPInstall Engine, defect, P2)

x86
Windows Vista
defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
mozilla2.0

People

(Reporter: jimm, Unassigned)

References

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

The extension manager currently does not support the Vista parental controls file blocking flag. This should be pretty easy to add once bug 412374 lands.
Flags: blocking-firefox3?
I guess I should add a caveat - this might require strings / ui so it might not be possible for Fx3.
This will not block the final release of Firefox 3.
Flags: wanted-firefox3+
Flags: blocking-firefox3?
Flags: blocking-firefox3-
Assignee: jmathies → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Product: Firefox → Toolkit
Component: Add-ons Manager → Installer: XPInstall Engine
Product: Toolkit → Core
QA Contact: extension.manager → xpi-engine
Priority: -- → P2
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla2.0
Assignee: nobody → jmathies
Attached image deny dialog
Pretty straight forward. One question I had related to dialog paths being in prefs for xpinstall - should this one should be there too? I'm not sure I understand why we do this.
Attachment #389388 - Flags: review?
Comment on attachment 389388 [details] [diff] [review] pc patch for xpinstall v.1 dveditz -> xpinstall changes
Attachment #389388 - Flags: review? → review?(dveditz)
Comment on attachment 389388 [details] [diff] [review] pc patch for xpinstall v.1 Benjamin, any chance you have the time to look at this?
Attachment #389388 - Flags: review?(dveditz) → review?(benjamin)
Attachment #389388 - Flags: review?(benjamin) → review?(dtownsend)
Comment on attachment 389388 [details] [diff] [review] pc patch for xpinstall v.1 The patch seems to be missing a bunch of files for the actual dialog. However I don't think a dialog is the right solution for this. This patch performs the check after we've already downloaded a part of the xpi and run a signature check. I think it would be better to handle this around the same level as the xpi whitelist check, sending out an xpinstall-install-denied notification that we could catch in browser.js and just display a notification bar or something. We perhaps should also make it so InstallTrigger.enabled is false for web content so it knows it won't be able to start an install.
Attachment #389388 - Flags: review?(dtownsend) → review-
Assignee: jmathies → nobody
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 1 year ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: