Closed
Bug 42438
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
Need "Prefill Form" menu item in edit menu
Categories
(Toolkit :: Form Manager, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: dveditz, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [nsbeta2-][nsbeta3+])
Attachments
(3 files)
10.73 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
4.58 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
8.58 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
For convenience and discoverability we need a "Prefill Form" menu item on the
right-click context menu, which should do the same things as the "Prefill
Safely" item under the "Tasks | Privacy [...] | Form Manager" menu.
Comment 1•25 years ago
|
||
This should go on the top level task menu as well. Make it really discoverable.
Putting on [nsbeta2-] radar. Not critical to beta2.
Whiteboard: [nsbeta2-]
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: --- → M18
Comment 4•25 years ago
|
||
W.r.t the main menus, this belongs in the `Edit' menu, not the `Tasks' menu. The
Tasks menu is used for stuff which is conceptually `outside' the current page
(mail, history, other tools with their own windows, various `managers', etc); it
is not where you go to find stuff relating to the editable contents of the
current page.
Keywords: nsbeta3
Summary: Need "Prefill Form" menu item on context menu → Need "Prefill Form" menu item on context menu and tasks menu
nsbeta3
changing subject to say context menu and tasks menu. Should be just below
"Privacy and Security >" before the separator line.
reassigning to german to get his point of view about whether this should be
under "Tasks" or "Edit" on the main menu bar - mpt has a good point.
Assignee: morse → german
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Summary: Need "Prefill Form" menu item on context menu and tasks menu → Need "Prefill Form" menu item on context menu and main menu
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
It's even worse than that ... This function is going to suffer from the
invisibility problem. Because the Edit menu (or the Tasks menu, for that
matter) is closed during normal browsing, I'm never going to be realize when
Mozilla is able to fill in a given form.
I see two possible solutions to this.
1. Use a transitory toolbar -- one which only appears when you're in a
pre-fillable form, and disappears afterwards. Like the one which will be
used for LINK element navigation. (Wasn't this the original idea, anyway?
The `German line', I think it was called.)
2. Use auto-complete, instead of pre-filling, for form elements.
Comment 8•25 years ago
|
||
There's a lot of talk here about placing the prefill-form button in other places
to make it more usable (context menu, german line, etc). But what about the
capture button. Wherever the prefill button is placed, the capture botton
should be as well.
I am still hoping we can materialize a transitory toolbar, that would offer
enough space for some assisting text as well as the button(s).
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
The difference between prefill and capture is that the form manager often
recognizes forms and prompts the user to save the values, or the user has done
the complete interview and has already set all their values so there really is
no more to capture.
Pre-fill is never done automatically, and users will do it much more often than
capturing data. In fact I would imagine after the first couple of weeks of
using the feature they will never capture again, but still use prefill. Or
maybe I'm misunderstanding the feature.
Comment 11•25 years ago
|
||
I agree -- I think the form manager right now is next to useless as long as its
activation remains so far away (Tasks > Privacy and Security > Form Manager)
from the context in which it's actually going to be used.
German, what are the current plans for the transitory toolbar? I think there
are a few issues that need to be considered when designing this:
1. How much space it should take up when visible, minimizing the proportion of
chrome to content, but allowing enough room for the necessary features.
2. Whether it should shift the content area when it is initially shown.
Shifting the content area is a bit disconcerting and annoying.
I'm currently working on a transitory toolbar for Bug 2800 (the LINK tag), and
these issues really need to be addressed for that as well. (See
http://www.prismelite.com/linktag/ for screen shots of it) Right now, it
appears in the Navigation toolbar under the URL field. As you can see from the
screen shots, the squeeze into this area is a bit tight. But the advantage is
that it doesn't take up a lot of space, or shift the content area.
Besides deciding where the toolbar is going to go, I think the other issues for
this bug are:
- What the toolbar buttons should be. Perhaps instead of separate buttons,
there could be a menubutton called "Form" which shows all the necessary menu
items pertaining to a form ("Fill in...", "View Saved Information...", "Save
Current Information...")
- When it should appear. Is it basically enabled for all HTML forms? Perhaps
it could be shown on page load whenever a page has forms... or only when a form
element receives focus. A method for determining whether a given form already
has saved information would be required to enable/disable the appropriate menu
items.
Comment 12•25 years ago
|
||
nav triage team:
nsbeta3+ to add something to the edit menu.
tbd what we add:
do we just add "PRefill Form with Captured Data" or also add "Capture Data from
Form"
Assignee: german → morse
Summary: Need "Prefill Form" menu item on context menu and main menu → Need "Prefill Form" menu item in edit menu
Whiteboard: [nsbeta2-] → [nsbeta2-][nsbeta3+]
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•25 years ago
|
||
What about the right-click context menu, too?
Re: my comments of 7/23: Steve has explained that capturing form data is page
specific and that if plain pre-fill from wallet data didn't work well you
would in fact want to capture data for that specific page. Since it was
unclear to me before I thought I'd mention it here, it means capturing could be
a much more common activity than I first thought.
Do we use the term "wallet" anywhere in public? "Prefill form from wallet" is
shorter and friendlier than "Prefill form from Captured Data". Certainly
it's a marketing and wordsmith call and I don't want to reopen a dead snake if
this has been hashed out (sorry, I got involved with this feature only well
after PR1), but I'd think a metaphor like wallet would be a lot easier to
explain and catch on than something as abstract and imposing as "Captured
Data".
Maybe it's the high-falutin' "Captured" that's throwing me, maybe something
simple like "saved" would be better.
"Prefill form with saved data" (values?) and "Save form data". Having the
two together would also help explain the feature in addition to the
convenience and need to capture data. A lonely "prefill form" menu item raises
the question of "prefill with what?"
I've gone well over my $0.02 budget so I'll quit now.
Comment 14•25 years ago
|
||
Marketing has nixed the term "wallet". It is never used anywhere anymore.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: M20 → M18
Comment 15•25 years ago
|
||
I recommend we add the menu item to Edit menu that says "Prefill Form" (JohnG's
suggestion is a bit too wordy, a static menu item should not have more than 3
words if possible). We have to make this item properly disabled when page does
not contain a form.
I would only add "Save Form Data" (like dveditz wording suggestion here - short
and friendly) if we can properly disable this item when a) we are not on a form
and b) when the form is empty. If the item stays "enabled" all the time it is
rather confusing for the end user what it does. If we can't do proper enabling,
than I'd rather not clutter the edit menu with this item. This second item also
requires proper feedback in a small message, stating something like
Your data on this form has been saved for later reuse.
[ ] don't show me this message again
[ OK ]
suggested position for the menu items (if we do both):
...
Select All
------------
Prefill Form
Save Form Data
------------
Preferences
if we do only the form fill item:
...
Select All
------------
Prefill Form
------------
Preferences
Comment 16•25 years ago
|
||
Making this fix in two stages. Stage 1 is a cleanup of current modules to make
the requested menu change easier to accomplish. Stage 2 is the actual menu
change. I am going to attach the diffs for each stage to this report along with
a description that will make it easy to code review.
The problem that is being addressed in stage 1 is the dialog that needs to be
put up if there is nothing to prefill. Currently that dialog is put up by the
javascript code that is calling the c++ prefill routine in wallet.cpp. If the
prefill routine is going to be called from more than one place, then each such
place will have to put up its own dialog. This is bad and the dialog should be
put up in the wallet.cpp routine instead. In fact, it used to be there but was
moved out due to problems with finding a parent window for the modal dialog.
That problem has since been solved so the dialog can and should be moved back to
wallet.cpp.
The changes to accomplish this are to add another parameter to the prefill
routine -- that parameter being the parent window. The changes involving this
added parameter are in:
extensions/wallet/public/nsIWalletService.idl
extensions/wallet/src/nsWalletService.cpp
extensions/wallet/src/wallet.h
extensions/wallet/src/wallet.cpp
Two points to note:
1. The prefill routine used to take a boolean parameter called doPrefillMessage.
That parameter is no longer needed and has been eliminated.
2. Logic in wallet.cpp's capture routine was improved slightly so that we can
now tell if all the fields contains null values in which case nothing is
captured. This enables us to put out a more informative alert message.
Finally the caller of all this needs to be modified so it passes the window
parameter. This change is in
nsBrowserInstance.cpp
Comment 17•25 years ago
|
||
Comment 18•25 years ago
|
||
Oops, I'm not through with stage 1 changes yet. I need to remove the dialog
from the javascript. That change is in
xpfe/communicator/resources/content/taskOverlay.js
And while I'm at it, I might as well clean up the appearance of the task menu a
wee bit. Those changes are in
xpfe/communicator/resources/content/taskOverlay.xul
xpfe/communicator/resources/locale/en-us/tasksOverlay.dtd
I'll attach this as stage 1.5 changes.
Comment 19•25 years ago
|
||
Comment 20•25 years ago
|
||
And now for stage 2 -- the actual addition of the wallet items to the edit menu.
The files changed now are:
xpfe/browser/resources/content/navigatorOverlay.xul
xpfe/communicator/resources/content/utilityOverlay.xul
xpfe/communicator/resources/content/utilityOverlay.js
xpfe/communicator/resources/locale/en-us/utilityOverlay.dtd
Comment 21•25 years ago
|
||
Comment 22•25 years ago
|
||
dbragg reviewed my changes so I have now checked them in. Closing as fixed.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 23•25 years ago
|
||
BTW, I added the items to both the edit menu and the right-context menu.
Comment 24•25 years ago
|
||
Save Form Data and Prefill Form are now in the Edit menu.
i've mentioned this earlier (either in person or over irc), but i'd've
preferred, ideally, to have the entire Privacy & Security submenu moved from
Tasks to its own toplevel menu (as it's rather long, and trowling thru it
presently is annoying to get something done). i'd rather not add these to the
Edit menu (since i associate *common* editing tasks there)... the context menu
is okay, but, again depending on the webpage (or frame) content, the context
menu can get quite long. *sigh* sorry to be such a lurker/complainer here.
however, thx to blake for filing bug 48860 --which might address my issues
above...
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Updated•17 years ago
|
Assignee: morse → nobody
Product: Core → Toolkit
QA Contact: bugzilla → form.manager
Target Milestone: M18 → ---
Version: Trunk → unspecified
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•