Closed
Bug 427978
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
Content Type icon is missing
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: ImageLib, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
mozilla1.9
People
(Reporter: bugmozz, Assigned: jimm)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(3 files)
70.11 KB,
image/jpeg
|
Details | |
1.03 KB,
patch
|
pavlov
:
review+
mtschrep
:
approval1.9+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
118.33 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
OK: 20080404_0123_firefox-3.0pre.en-US.win32.zip
NG: 20080404_0254_firefox-3.0pre.en-US.win32.zip
[bonsai]
http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?module=PhoenixTinderbox&date=explicit&mindate=1207297380&maxdate=1207302839
Updated•17 years ago
|
Blocks: 415273
Product: Firefox → Core
QA Contact: file.handling → file-handling
Summary: Content Type icon is missing. → Content Type icon is missing
Updated•17 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → jmathies
Flags: blocking1.9?
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
pal-moz - does that happen for every entry in the list? Or just some?
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
So, the reason the extension was extracted into the file path was because it's used as the fallback if no file or content type is available...
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
> pal-moz - does that happen for every entry in the list? Or just some?
It happens for any moz-icon: which only specifies an extension.
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
Hmm, either GetPrimaryExtension is failing for the contentType, in which case in the past we would just use fileExt (but now use an empty defFileExt), or it's returning a different extension for defFileExt that doesn't point to the application in question. The first seems more likely.
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
wait a minute, "which only specifies an extension". That seems to rule out GetPrimaryExtension completely.
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 6•17 years ago
|
||
So I think just assinging fileExt to filePath when it's declared should fix this.
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 7•17 years ago
|
||
moz-pal, do you have the ability to test applying this to see if it addresses the problem?
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 8•17 years ago
|
||
er sorry, pal-moz..
Updated•17 years ago
|
Assignee: jmathies → nobody
Component: File Handling → ImageLib
QA Contact: file-handling → imagelib
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•17 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → jmathies
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #314620 -
Flags: review?(pavlov)
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•17 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P2
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•17 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.9
Updated•17 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.9? → blocking1.9+
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #314620 -
Flags: review?(pavlov) → review+
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #314620 -
Flags: approval1.9?
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #314620 -
Flags: approval1.9? → approval1.9+
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•17 years ago
|
Keywords: regression → checkin-needed
Updated•17 years ago
|
Keywords: regression
Comment 10•17 years ago
|
||
mozilla/modules/libpr0n/decoders/icon/win/nsIconChannel.cpp 1.47
Comment 11•17 years ago
|
||
verified fixed using Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9pre) Gecko/2008042705 Minefield/3.0pre ID:2008042705
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•