432237 - Separate mozilla-central and actionmonkey in tinderbox

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Release Engineering :: General, defect, P3)

Description

[Benjamin Smedberg]

We currently have a single "Mozilla2" tinderbox with both actionmonkey and mozilla-central builds. This is going to be unworkable. Instead, I think we should create separate tinderbox pages for "mozilla-central" and "actionmonkey" and send the build results to each page individually.

This also means we can send the actionmonkey talos results directly to the actionmonkey waterfall, even though they aren't officially in production, without worrying about them being red or orange and causing "mozilla2" to shut down.

Comment 1

[Benjamin Smedberg]

Alternately, we probably should consider moving everything that currently reports to "Firefox" and have it report to "Firefox-3.0.x" and have the mozilla-central stuff report to "Firefox". Thoughts?

Comment 3

[(not currently active) Ted Mielczarek]

If we were following existing convention, the current "Firefox" tinderbox would wind up as Mozilla1.9, although I guess the Firefox tinderbox changed convention anyway, so Firefox3.0 would probably be fine.

Comment 4

[John O'Duinn [:joduinn] (please use "needinfo?" flag)]

(In reply to comment #3)
> If we were following existing convention, the current "Firefox" tinderbox would
> wind up as Mozilla1.9, 
I'd be in favor of Mozilla1.9, as it fits with the existing Mozilla1.8.0, Mozilla1.8 and Mozilla2. 

What if we leave mozilla-central on the existing Mozilla2 tinderbox, and then have other mercurial branches show up on tinderbox called Mozilla2actionmonkey, Mozilla2projectfoo, Mozilla2projectbar, etc? 


although I guess the Firefox tinderbox changed
> convention anyway, so Firefox3.0 would probably be fine.
> 

Comment 5

[Benjamin Smedberg]

why "Mozilla2actionmonkey" instead of just "actionmonkey"? Sounds verbose. Mozilla 2 is just a version number, I'd hate to get caught up on it... what happens if actionmonkey gets bumped to mozilla 2.1?

Comment 6

[John O'Duinn [:joduinn] (please use "needinfo?" flag)]

(In reply to comment #5)
> why "Mozilla2actionmonkey" instead of just "actionmonkey"? Sounds verbose.
> Mozilla 2 is just a version number, I'd hate to get caught up on it... what
> happens if actionmonkey gets bumped to mozilla 2.1?

Yeah, "actionmonkey" is an equally fine name, imho. 

I was mostly concerned about using tinderboxen called Mozilla1.9 (for Firefox3.0) and Mozilla2 (for mozilla-central), as this felt consistent with how we've named tinderboxen for previous branches.

(Obviously, all just my opinion, not trying to bikeshed this!)

Comment 7

[[e-mail] (:bhearsum)]

I'm going to go ahead and create Actionmonkey - there seems to be agreement on that name.

I'll leave the mozilla-central machines on Mozilla2 until we decide what to do there.

Comment 8

[[e-mail] (:bhearsum)]

Attachment: [checked in] move dep/nightly actionmonkey

Comment 9

[[e-mail] (:bhearsum)]

Attachment: move actionmonkey talos to Actionmonkey tree

Comment 10

[[e-mail] (:bhearsum)]

Comment on attachment 320538 [details] [diff] [review]
[checked in] move dep/nightly actionmonkey

Applied in 8b9ebb53c0e7

Comment 11

[[e-mail] (:bhearsum)]

Alright, future builds ("dep" and "nightly" class) of Actionmonkey should be reporting to the 'Actionmonkey' tinderbox now.

I'll let Alice deal with the Talos ones.

Comment 12

[Vladimir Vukicevic [:vlad] [:vladv] (needinfo me, slow to respond)]

Comment on attachment 320540 [details] [diff] [review]
move actionmonkey talos to Actionmonkey tree


>+c['status'].append(TinderboxMailNotifier(
>+                       fromaddr="[e-mail]",
>+                       tree="Mozilla2",

^ Should't that be Actionmonkey?

Comment 13

[alice nodelman [:alice] [:anode]]

Attachment: move actionmonkey talos machines from Mozilla2 waterfall

Comment 14

[alice nodelman [:alice] [:anode]]

Move talos actionmonkey testers to the Actionmonkey waterfall.

Checking in master.cfg;
/cvsroot/mozilla/tools/buildbot-configs/testing/talos/perfmaster/master.cfg,v  <--  master.cfg
new revision: 1.57; previous revision: 1.56
done

Comment 15

[alice nodelman [:alice] [:anode]]

Now that talos is shifted is there anything else to do here?

Comment 16

[Vladimir Vukicevic [:vlad] [:vladv] (needinfo me, slow to respond)]

Don't think so, looks good!