Closed Bug 433240 Opened 17 years ago Closed 17 years ago

Late correction patches for Catalan Firefox 3

Categories

(Mozilla Localizations :: ca / Catalan, defect)

Product:
Mozilla Localizations
Component:
ca / Catalan
Type:
defect
Priority:
Not set
Severity:
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

Status:
VERIFIED FIXED

People

(Reporter: toniher, Assigned: Pike)

Details

(Whiteboard: [RC2+])

Attachments

(1 file, 3 obsolete files)

Correction patch
2.24 KB, patch
Pike
: review+
Pike
: approval1.9+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
Attached patch Correction patch — — Splinter Review
I will submit late Catalan correction patches in this bug.
Attachment #320434 - Flags: review?(l10n)
We're currently CLOSED for RC1, I'll look at it once the tree ropens, for either 3.0.1 or RC2.
No problem, Axel. I will simply attach patches here, so when tree opens this can be approved.
Comment on attachment 320434 [details] [diff] [review] Correction patch This looks OK technically. Moving into the approval queue, please don't land before approval1.9 is actually granted.
Attachment #320434 - Flags: review?(l10n)
Attachment #320434 - Flags: review+
Attachment #320434 - Flags: approval1.9?
Taking this bug for landing.
Assignee: toniher → l10n
Comment on attachment 320434 [details] [diff] [review] Correction patch approving my landing.
Attachment #320434 - Flags: approval1.9? → approval1.9+
Landed, marking FIXED. This should get verified on a tinderbox build still. Checking in browser.dtd; /l10n/l10n/ca/browser/chrome/browser/browser.dtd,v <-- browser.dtd new revision: 1.47; previous revision: 1.46 done Checking in history/history.dtd; /l10n/l10n/ca/browser/chrome/browser/history/history.dtd,v <-- history.dtd new revision: 1.4; previous revision: 1.3 done
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [RC2+]
Attached patch Little typo corrected (obsolete) — — Splinter Review
Attachment #322529 - Flags: review?
Attachment #322529 - Flags: approval1.9?
Attached patch Remove of extra sentence (obsolete) — — Splinter Review
Attachment #322531 - Flags: review?(l10n)
Attachment #322531 - Flags: approval1.9?
Comment on attachment 322529 [details] [diff] [review] Little typo corrected Please file a new bug on new patches, it's impossible to keep track what's landed and what didn't without that.
Attachment #322529 - Flags: review?
Attachment #322529 - Flags: approval1.9?
Attached patch Typos corrected (obsolete) — — Splinter Review
Attachment #322532 - Flags: review?(l10n)
Attachment #322532 - Flags: approval1.9?
Attachment #322531 - Flags: review?(l10n)
Attachment #322531 - Flags: approval1.9?
Attachment #322532 - Flags: review?(l10n)
Attachment #322532 - Flags: approval1.9?
(In reply to comment #9) > (From update of attachment 322529 [details] [diff] [review]) > Please file a new bug on new patches, it's impossible to keep track what's > landed and what didn't without that. > Ok. I will file a new bug.
Comment on attachment 322529 [details] [diff] [review] Little typo corrected These are in bug 435774 now.
Attachment #322529 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #322531 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #322532 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: