Closed Bug 440269 Opened 16 years ago Closed 16 years ago

KB article: Web sites or add-ons incorrectly report incompatible browser

Categories

(support.mozilla.org :: Knowledge Base Articles, task)

x86
Linux
task
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED FIXED

People

(Reporter: jason.barnabe, Assigned: bbayles)

References

()

Details

It's gonna be tough finding a good name for this one.
Article is up. Title is debatable, but I think that's the gist of what we want.

Marking fixed... review?
Assignee: nobody → bbayles
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
I don't like the title. :-)
It could easily be interpreted as version of web site, or version of add-on.
Plus, what is the error Java gives, when the UA is spoofed as IE?
How about: Web sites or add-ons think you are using a different browser or Firefox version than hat you have.

Little long though. :-(
How about: "Web sites or add-ons say you have a different version of Firefox" ?

Kind of like our ((Web sites say cookies are blocked)), and the "than what you have" is implied.
Don't we have cases of this happening when the browser is spoofed, not the version? In other words, if the UA indicates IE.
I don't think I've seen that on the forum, but it's certainly possible, and probably should incorporate it into the title...

If I recall correctly, the most common cause is the MegaUpload Toolbar extension, which changes the UA to MEGAUPLOADsomething with the version you had when you installed it. The next most common is a Creative Zen thing, which changes the UA to a CreativeSomethingAndADate.

The User Agent Switcher extension resets the UA on restart, so if you're intentionally faking your UA with that, you won't be hit by this. There are other extenions that might not do that, though.

So... "Web sites say you are using a different browser or version of Firefox" ?

Could another option be to set up redirects with different titles?
Can you include these common causes for good searchiness?
OK.

Also renamed; feel free to change to something less cumbersome.
How about original title but s/version/browser ?
(In reply to comment #9)
> How about original title but s/version/browser ?

I like that title: "Web sites or add-ons report incompatible browser"
This may need an adjustment. "Web sites or add-ons report incompatible browser" is overlapping with <http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Add-ons+are+incompatible+with+Firefox+3>. How about we add "incorrectly: in the title:
"Web sites or add-ons incorrectly report incompatible browser"
The name definitely is the hard part of this. :)
Summary: KB article: Something changes useragent setting, chaos ensues → KB article: Web sites or add-ons incorrectly report incompatible browser
I did some reworking of the intro, because it's not good to state the cause before the problem, and I want to help users who don't know if incompatibility report is incorrect.
So rather than move it to the KB quite yet, I want someone to have a look at my changes.
I think the "If you have not verified that the web site or add-on is compatible with your version of Firefox, see: " part needs work. There's nothing that would give instructions on how to verify in those articles. What if you removed that part and specified in the first bullet point of the article "even though you are using a version of Firefox the site claims to support". Then include links to the articles that describe legitimate incompatible situations somewhere else.
Moved to KB at:
Wed 02 of Jul, 2008 22:46 EST

Any further discussion should take place on the staging copy: <http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/*Web+sites+or+add-ons+incorrectly+report+incompatible+browser>.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.