Closed Bug 44147 Opened 25 years ago Closed 25 years ago

improperly parented modal dialog in caps

Categories

(Core :: Security: CAPS, defect, P3)

defect

Tracking

()

VERIFIED FIXED

People

(Reporter: danm.moz, Assigned: security-bugs)

References

Details

(Keywords: embed, Whiteboard: [nsbeta3+])

nsNetSupportDialog should only be used as a backup plan if no other nsIPrompt interface is available. It has been used in dozens of places because of its seductive convenience. But it's flawed, creating modal windows that don't behave correctly; the cause of various blanket bugs like 25684 and 39439 (both currently considered nsbeta2+). This problem can only be fixed by trying much harder to find a proper window to be the modal dialog's parent. nsNetSupportDialog should be relegated to providing backup when herculean efforts to locate the actual parent window fail for some reason. As an example, the cookie service has been taught to use a proper parent window for its dialog by laboriously storing a reference to that window's nsIPrompt in nsHTTPChannel, from which it can be extracted and passed around while processing notification events, punting to nsNetSupportDialog only when no other choice is available. That same sort of thing needs to be done in many more places. One such place is nsScriptSecurityManager.cpp, CheckConfirmDialog. Happy recipients of this bug would spread the happiness most widely if they would start using a good nsIPrompt window. The "modal windows don't behave nicely" bugs are being made dependent on this bug and its siblings, and will eventually be closed as "as fixed as they're going to get" once these have all been considered.
Reassigning to morse, who wrote CheckConfirmDialog (I think).
Assignee: mstoltz → morse
Blocks: 25684
I may have written that dialog for my own module, but I have no idea of how it is used in your module. The problem is not with the dialog but with finding a window for it and that is module-specific. Reassigning back to mstoltz.
Assignee: morse → mstoltz
Yes -- it would be fairly easy to add a parameter to CheckConfirmDialog, giving it for its use an nsIPrompt that corresponds to the actual (browser) window involved. Steve could do that. The real issue is getting that nsIPrompt, which is more a problem of the module calling CheckConfirmDialog.
I'll look at this soon.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Maybe nsbeta3.
Keywords: nsbeta3
Target Milestone: --- → M18
Because of the use of nsCommonDialogs, or the use of the nsIPrompt service, this component can not be used for embedding. Adding the embedding keyword. How To Bring Up A Modal Dialog: You need to know what window you want to have modality against. This will be a nsIDOMWindow. Using a magic "hidden" window breaks modality and embedding application may not have this hack. One you have the parent DOMWindow, you simply: nsCOMPtr<nsIPrompt> prompter; aDOMWinow->GetPrompt(getter_AddRefs(prompter)); if (prompter) prompter-> Any other way that you try to bring up a dialog may not work in an embedding application. To reiterate, do not use the nsICommonDialogs interface -or- a nsIPrompt service if you want your component in a non-seamonkey app. I don't have a DOMWindow?! If you don't have a DOMWindow, you need to get one. Just about every place I saw that used the hidden window, could have used the real parent window with some work. There really is no place in the code where we should be displaying a modal dialog without knowing what parent window we are modal against. If you find a case where you don't have a top level window, lets talk.
Keywords: embed
adding myself to cc list
Upgrading to [nsbeta3+].
Whiteboard: [nsbeta3+]
Fix checked in.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updating QA Contact to junruh@netscape.com
QA Contact: czhang → junruh
Verified with the 9/22 Win98 build.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.