Closed
Bug 446070
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Relabel "Edit Summary" in editor
Categories
(support.mozilla.org :: Knowledge Base Software, task)
support.mozilla.org
Knowledge Base Software
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
1.2.1
People
(Reporter: cilias, Assigned: paulc)
References
()
Details
(Whiteboard: tiki_string, tiki_upstreamed)
Attachments
(1 file)
2.67 KB,
patch
|
laura
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
People are not summarizing their edits, or citing references. Let's rename "Edit Summary" to: "Describe your edit and cite a reference"
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
probably more effective to make the field required, but I agree "Edit Summary" always seems like you're editing the summary of the article rather than the edit.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
Great idea. I've filed bug 446201.
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
Seems very trivial, and would make the UI easier to understand.
Severity: normal → trivial
Target Milestone: --- → 1.4
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Note to self to check other places where "Edit Summary" may show up :)
Assignee: nobody → paul.craciunoiu
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
So we'll stick with "Describe your edit and cite a reference"? That's a bit wordy. What if we just put "Describe your edit"? If references are much needed, however, we can make it as Chris suggested.
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
Is edit friendly enough? we could say "changes" instead, but maybe edit is more consistent with other references?
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
Why the "cite a reference" part? That confuses me, as most of my edits don't have references. How about something like "Describe the changes you made:" ?
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
Sometimes people make edits with info that we can't confirm; so we want to encourage new contributors to cite references.
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
What's the final word on this?
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
Chris, it sounds like we're making the label harder to understand in order to avoid rare cases of people making claims that aren't validated. If this happens only "sometimes," I'd rather a reviewer ensures that the info is correct by e.g. testing it than relying on the author's reference (which might still be incorrect). Saying "cite a reference" for people that don't have one is going to be confusing. My suggestion is still "Describe the changes you made:". What do you think?
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•15 years ago
|
||
This is more about instilling good practices. (Particularly in cases in which solutions cannot be tested on-demand, because we can't replicate the problem to begin with. :-) ) If it's going to cause more harm (confusion) than good, "Describe the changes you made:" sounds good.
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•15 years ago
|
||
Okay, you guys have to agree before I post a patch :)
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•15 years ago
|
||
Also placed the colon inside the {tr}, yay!
Attachment #387709 -
Flags: review?(smirkingsisyphus)
Attachment #387709 -
Flags: review?(laura)
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #387709 -
Flags: review?(laura) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•15 years ago
|
||
r29661 / r29662 Is 1.2.1 the next release?
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: 1.4 → 1.2.1
Verified FIXED on https://support-stage.mozilla.org/tiki-editpage.php?locale=en-US&page=*Clearing+private+data.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #387709 -
Flags: review?(smirkingsisyphus)
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: tiki_string ?
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: tiki_string ? → tiki_string, tiki_upstreamed
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•