Closed
Bug 450047
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
Outdated comment incorrectly describes how ad-blocking works
Categories
(Camino Graveyard :: Annoyance Blocking, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: alqahira, Assigned: alqahira)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
1.05 KB,
patch
|
stuart.morgan+bugzilla
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
I was looking for something else the other day and stumbled upon this outdated/incorrect comment in WebFeatures.mm, which claims we're still using userContent.css for our ad-blocking. I've updated the comment to reflect the reality of the past several years ;)
Attachment #333176 -
Flags: superreview?(mikepinkerton)
|
||
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 333176 [details] [diff] [review]
Fix the comment
sr=smorgan
Attachment #333176 -
Flags: superreview?(mikepinkerton) → superreview+
|
Assignee | |
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
Landed on cvs trunk.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•