Closed Bug 455081 Opened 17 years ago Closed 17 years ago

Update reporter to re-implement status page

Categories

(Socorro :: General, task)

task
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: morgamic, Assigned: ozten)

Details

Attachments

(3 files, 2 obsolete files)

Once the cron job is in place to update a key->value table we need a simple script to pull it out and display it in the php reporter. Les - could you work with Ted to come up with: 1) a simple way to store this info 2) a simple MVC for it in the reporter
Assignee: lorchard → aking
Attached image Screenshot for patch1
Woo! That looks awesome, Austin.
This patch has MVC for updates status screen. Attached is a screenshot. We graph 4 stats (# of waiting jobs, # processors, avg process in sec, avg job wait) and show 2 more stats (date job recently completed, date of oldest job in queue) in the table of data. The server has three states happy, grumpy, and deathly Questions I have: 1) How frequent should server status be (5 minutes)? 2) How much history should we show (1 hour)? 3) What makes for a happy server? Which criteria and what are the thresholds. Currently this is hardcoded to happy TODO: * I need to add where clause to limit server_status table query ( once I know answers to 1 and 2 above ) * Add a link to status page to the header ( site wide navigation ) Not directly related, but in patch for code review: - pulled platform ("Windows" "windows" "#3Ef") info out of model and into a config file
Attachment #344122 - Flags: review?(lorchard)
Comment on attachment 344122 [details] [diff] [review] Patch depends on new table server_status populated by cron job Adding morgamic to code review
Attachment #344122 - Flags: review?(morgamic)
Reuploading patch. This time as the native svn diff.
Attachment #344122 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #344124 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #344122 - Flags: review?(morgamic)
Attachment #344122 - Flags: review?(lorchard)
Comment on attachment 344130 [details] [diff] [review] Added missing model and config to patch Adding morgamic as reviewer
Attachment #344130 - Flags: review?(morgamic)
Attachment #344130 - Flags: review?(lorchard)
Comment on attachment 344130 [details] [diff] [review] Added missing model and config to patch Looks good to me, and seems to work fine on my install. I think morgamic mentioned it'd be nice to have a table of contents or something at the top of the page to jump down to individual graphs. Also, might be good to file follow-up bugs to get a) the crontab script together to populate the server_status table, if not already done, and b) to finish the TODO for the calculation of the happy / grumpy / deathly status. Oh, and also also: Would be useful to include SQL to create the server_status table in the patch, or better yet in SVN once this is checked in. Check out the sql/ directory one level up from the webapp-php directory.
Attachment #344130 - Flags: review?(lorchard) → review+
Note: python and db feedback from les Thanks, Bug 455080 has those details, yes did check in DDL SQL. Check in r634. Other minor fixes in patch: Changed report/do_list OS crash graph to be bar charts of total # of crashes by OS. Make OS names and colors a config instead of model code.
Marking fixed.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Austin/Les - what do you think of this as an alternative to having the table of contents?
Attachment #344442 - Flags: review?
Attachment #344442 - Flags: review? → review?(aking)
Attachment #344442 - Flags: review?(lorchard)
Attachment #344130 - Flags: review?(morgamic) → review+
Les - I noticed we picked 4.0.1 strict but it did not validate and we were self-terminating elements all over so I flipped it. Mostly I like making people mad by serving xhtml as text/html.
Comment on attachment 344442 [details] [diff] [review] alternate version of status page w/ graph selector I think the patch improves the page. I don't see any issues with the code. My one concern is putting related graphs behind a a dropdown removes the ability to compare them side by side.
Attachment #344442 - Flags: review?(aking) → review+
Attachment #344442 - Flags: review?(lorchard)
Component: Socorro → General
Product: Webtools → Socorro
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: