Closed Bug 457417 Opened 17 years ago Closed 17 years ago

[1.8 branch] Assertion failure: (uintN)js_GetSrcNoteOffset(sn, 0) == ss->top

Categories

(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)

1.8 Branch
defect
Not set
major

Tracking

()

VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 457093

People

(Reporter: bc, Unassigned)

References

Details

(Keywords: assertion, regression, testcase)

I screwed up and missed this one. I've been tracking the failure but missed filing the bug. ecma_3/Unicode/uc-005.js #0 JS_Assert (s=0xf57fc "(uintN)js_GetSrcNoteOffset(sn, 0) == ss->top", file=0xf4f81 "jsopcode.c", ln=2397) at jsutil.c:63 #1 0x000912d9 in Decompile (ss=0xbfffd6f4, pc=0x20d390 "?", nb=72) at jsopcode.c:2397 #2 0x00098d48 in js_DecompileCode (jp=0x20cfb0, script=0x20d320, pc=0x20d350 "?", len=72, pcdepth=0) at jsopcode.c:4199 #3 0x00099706 in js_DecompileFunction (jp=0x20cfb0, fun=0x815e38) at jsopcode.c:4397 #4 0x000196ca in JS_DecompileFunction (cx=0x200550, fun=0x815e38, indent=0) at jsapi.c:4170 #5 0x0004ed32 in js_fun_toString (cx=0x200550, obj=0x806ce0, indent=0, argc=0, argv=0x8196d0, rval=0xbfffd974) at jsfun.c:1533 #6 0x0004ed96 in fun_toString (cx=0x200550, obj=0x806ce0, argc=0, argv=0x8196d0, rval=0xbfffd974) at jsfun.c:1543 #7 0x00057ef3 in js_Invoke (cx=0x200550, argc=0, flags=0) at jsinterp.c:1387 #8 0x00069baf in js_Interpret (cx=0x200550, pc=0x20c8bb ":", result=0xbfffe2cc) at jsinterp.c:3964 #9 0x000588df in js_Execute (cx=0x200550, chain=0x8056c0, script=0x81c200, down=0x0, flags=0, result=0xbffff3b4) at jsinterp.c:1647 #10 0x000197d4 in JS_ExecuteScript (cx=0x200550, obj=0x8056c0, script=0x81c200, rval=0xbffff3b4) at jsapi.c:4204 #11 0x00001e6c in Process (cx=0x200550, obj=0x8056c0, filename=0xbffff652 "uc-005.js", forceTTY=0) at js.c:232 #12 0x00002837 in ProcessArgs (cx=0x200550, obj=0x8056c0, argv=0xbffff4f8, argc=10) at js.c:437 #13 0x00007635 in main (argc=10, argv=0xbffff4f8, envp=0xbffff524) at js.c:3188
Flags: wanted1.8.1.x?
Flags: in-testsuite+
Flags: in-litmus-
Flags: blocking1.8.1.18?
Is this fixed by the patch from bug 457093?
(In reply to comment #1) > Is this fixed by the patch from bug 457093? yes.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Flags: wanted1.8.1.x?
Flags: blocking1.8.1.18?
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
v test passes linux/mac/windows 1.8.1
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.