Closed
Bug 469136
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
The font size is too small with the Classic skin (especially in bug comments)
Categories
(Bugzilla :: User Interface, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 3.2
People
(Reporter: graeme, Assigned: LpSolit)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(3 files, 3 obsolete files)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.4) Gecko/2008102920 Firefox/3.0.4 Build Identifier: 3.2 When using IE (v6 - on XPSP3) the comments (on show_bug.cgi) and the mail addresses listed (in process_bug.cgi after a change is made to a bug) are much smaller than in versions prior to v3.2. The fonts are in the region of 8pt size which makes them hard to read when using standard display sizes in IE. Fonts display fine in the new Dusk skin, and look fine in Firefox3 too. Adding the following to IE-fixes.css (in skins/custom) seems to make the relevant text much easier to read: div#bugzilla-body dl dd dl dd { _font-size: 1.1em; } .bz_comment_text { _font-size: 1.1em; } There may well be other areas that I haven't noticed (or had users complain about - I use Firefox so it's not noticable to me). Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Navigate to bug - view comment fields. 2. Change bug and commit - view mail addresses in notification mail summary. Actual Results: Font size is very small and hard to read. Expected Results: Font size be more readable as per 3.0 versions.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Setting version and correcting title
Summary: Font too small in IE in Comment (show_bug.cgi) and mail addresses (process_bug.cgi) with classic skin → Font too small in IE for Comment text (show_bug.cgi) and mail addresses (process_bug.cgi) with classic skin
Version: unspecified → 3.2
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
v1 Patch to template/IE-fixes.css to correct undersized text. Corrects .bz_comment_text and the email address display on process_bug.cgi. bz_comment_text font-size corrected separately to .uneditable_textarea.
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 352549 [details] [diff] [review] v1 No, this is not the right fix. The same problem appears with Firefox. I have a patch which fixes this problem.
Attachment #352549 -
Flags: review-
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
body {font-size: small;} has been added in bug 374020, without any reason AFAIK. The Dusk theme is not affected because it overrides this value.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Depends on: 374020
Ever confirmed: true
Keywords: regression
OS: Windows XP → All
Hardware: PC → All
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 3.2
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
Assignee: ui → LpSolit
Attachment #352549 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #352555 -
Flags: review?(guy.pyrzak)
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•15 years ago
|
Summary: Font too small in IE for Comment text (show_bug.cgi) and mail addresses (process_bug.cgi) with classic skin → The font size is too small with the Classic skin (especially in bug comments)
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 352555 [details] [diff] [review] patch, v1 This is a huge change that is much too much. Instead I'd suggest pre { font-size:medium; }
Attachment #352555 -
Flags: review?(guy.pyrzak) → review-
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
Since dusk seems to be fine we can also use: .bz_comment { font-size:9pt; } which is what dusk uses for its comments.
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #7) > Since dusk seems to be fine we can also use: > .bz_comment { > font-size:9pt; > } I think modifing the "font-size" parameter works fine. (like comment #6) # I've tested at RC1 or 2 age.. But I'd like to argue using the fixed "<numeric> pt" value in our default CSS, at the viewpoint of UE.
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
As discussed on IRC.
Attachment #352555 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #352676 -
Flags: review?(guy.pyrzak)
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
This fix doesn't seem quite right, in view of the fact that things work fine in Dusk but not in Classic. What are we doing in Dusk that's different?
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 11•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #10) > This fix doesn't seem quite right, in view of the fact that things work fine in > Dusk but not in Classic. What are we doing in Dusk that's different? Dusk overrides font sizes defined in global.css, and replaces them by fixed font sizes (e.g. 9pt). But this works in Dusk because it uses fixed font sizes everywhere (not only for comments). We cannot do the same in Classic without fixing all relative font sizes by fixed ones, which is IMO too much changes.
Comment 12•15 years ago
|
||
Okay, agreed. Although I thought we fixed this in some other way for .uneditable_textarea (that I'd think we should do the same with for comments).
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 13•15 years ago
|
||
As discussed with pyrzak on IRC, <kbd> also uses monospace, so we must include this tag too, else release notes really look weird with IE.
Attachment #352676 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #352908 -
Flags: review?(guy.pyrzak)
Attachment #352676 -
Flags: review?(guy.pyrzak)
Comment 14•15 years ago
|
||
Comment 15•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 352908 [details] [diff] [review] patch, v3 looks good to me. It might also fix the other bug that is assigned to me that has the same issue.
Attachment #352908 -
Flags: review?(guy.pyrzak) → review+
Comment 16•15 years ago
|
||
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•15 years ago
|
Flags: approval3.2+
Flags: approval+
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 17•15 years ago
|
||
tip: Checking in skins/standard/global.css; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/skins/standard/global.css,v <-- global.css new revision: 1.57; previous revision: 1.56 done 3.2: Checking in skins/standard/global.css; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/skins/standard/global.css,v <-- global.css new revision: 1.47.2.6; previous revision: 1.47.2.5 done
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•