Closed
Bug 47276
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
mozilla doesn't display images
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: ImageLib, defect, P3)
Core
Graphics: ImageLib
Tracking
()
M18
People
(Reporter: tm, Assigned: morse)
References
()
Details
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20000801
BuildID: 2000080120
Bad: when image loading is disabled, a page without images is loaded. it' ok,
but when I tried to display image (right click on image, select view image), new
window appeared and nothing inside). this affects all versions
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Edit/preferences/advanced/cookies&images/disable all images
2.load a page with some images
3.right click on image/view image
Actual Results: nothing - only new window openned
Expected Results: image loaded inside
Comment 1•25 years ago
|
||
Confimed on linux 2000080108. This looks like it might belong to compositor,
reassigning in hopes someone in compositor can say if they own this?
Assignee: asa → kmcclusk
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: Browser-General → Compositor
Ever confirmed: true
QA Contact: doronr → petersen
Comment 2•25 years ago
|
||
I can confirm this on NT, win98 and Mac OS9 branch and trunk mozilla Installer
bits 08/02. Updating from PC Linux to ALL ALL
OS: Linux → All
Hardware: PC → All
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
Not a compositor issue. May be a UI or imagelib issue.
Pam: any ideas on who owns this?
Assignee: kmcclusk → pnunn
Component: Compositor → ImageLib
I'll take it.
View-images use synth documents. There are some
load issues I've been looking at that could be related.
-p
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: --- → M18
Wait a minute.
If you disable the images, you disable the images.
And disabling images is a security issue as well as
a display issue.
I'm bringing in morse & mcafee to this. First we have to hash
out what is the correct behavior. Reassigning to morse to get
it on his radar.
-p
Assignee: pnunn → morse
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Comment 6•25 years ago
|
||
I agree with pnunn, if you disable images you shouldn't
be able to load them individually either.
Persumeably this is for low bandwidth or ? security reasons.
Assignee | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
This is a dup of bug 34165 which complained that if an image was blocked, then
you couldn't even load it individually (i.e., from the right-context menu). The
justification was that you might have checked the "block images from loading"
checkbox in the pref panel because you have a low bandwidth connection. But
then after the page loads you might want to view an individual image so you
right-click it. You now have explicitly said that you want this image to load
so it should load, despite what the pref setting currently is.
So to fix that bug I added code to if.cpp that doesn't block an image from
loading if the image is the entire page being requested. To see my
change, search that file for
Check to see if the image is the whole page
Unfortunately there were some cases in which my test didn't work and so some
images could be loaded individually and others couldn't. See the other bug for
details.
In any case, this bug reort is a dup of that other bug so I'm marking it as
such.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 34165 ***
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•