Closed
Bug 473692
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
Use "General" as the name in the first tab in Preferences rather than "Main"
Categories
(Firefox :: Settings UI, defect)
Firefox
Settings UI
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Firefox 3.6a1
People
(Reporter: jose.fandos, Assigned: Natch)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Keywords: polish, user-doc-complete, Whiteboard: [polish-easy] [polish-visual] [polish-p3])
Attachments
(1 file, 3 obsolete files)
|
1.32 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090114 Shiretoko/3.1b3pre
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090114 Shiretoko/3.1b3pre
To follow what seems to be the standard in Mac OS X, change the name of the first tab in the Preferences window from Main to General
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Click on the Firefox -> Preferences menu under OS X
2. The Preferences window opens with the "Main" tab open
3. That "Main" tab should be called "General" instead.
Updated•17 years ago
|
Component: Shell Integration → Preferences
QA Contact: shell.integration → preferences
Updated•17 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
Assignee: nobody → highmind63
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #362057 -
Flags: review?(gavin.sharp)
Comment 3•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 362057 [details] [diff] [review]
fix
one nit: using an #ifdef as opposed to an #ifndef is clearer, I think.
Attachment #362057 -
Flags: review?(gavin.sharp) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
Why is this Mac-specific? There's another "General" tab under "Advanced", regardless of the OS.
The German locale also treats "Main" like "General". Not sure what the other locales do.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•16 years ago
|
||
Or better yet, can we check this in because it has a patch and r+ and file followups? Getting reviews these days isn't always the simplest of tasks ;)...
Thanks gavin!
Comment 8•16 years ago
|
||
I'd rather get it right from the start, as this isn't an isolated change; translators will have to deal with this.
Comment 9•16 years ago
|
||
This isn't a hard patch to review, so whatever way we decide to go I doubt getting review is going to be a problem!
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 10•16 years ago
|
||
>Alex, thoughts?
Two things we are trying to balance:
1) consistency with the surrounding OS
2) consistency with previous versions of Firefox
changing from "general" to "main" on OS X gives us 1 (at the cost of 2). We shouldn't change on other platforms because that doesn't give us 1 or 2.
Comment 11•16 years ago
|
||
What's your reference on the OS side? Explorer on XP and IE 7 use "General" (in German, though).
Comment 12•16 years ago
|
||
Yep your right, Windows is using the term general as well. (for some reason I incorrectly remembered them using main).
OS: Mac OS X → All
Comment 13•16 years ago
|
||
OTOH, there's nothing too _general_ about either the startup or the download related prefs, while they're the _main_ prefs to set for the users (as in "most useful"). "Main" just doesn't seem to easily translate into German, being neither adverb nor noun but a prefix...
| Assignee | ||
Comment 14•16 years ago
|
||
Attachment #362060 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #364728 -
Flags: review?(gavin.sharp)
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #364728 -
Flags: ui-review?(faaborg)
Attachment #364728 -
Flags: review?(gavin.sharp)
Attachment #364728 -
Flags: review+
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #364728 -
Flags: ui-review?(faaborg) → ui-review+
| Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 15•16 years ago
|
||
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/9428da59204d
Since this didn't change the entity name, feel free to request approval for 1.9.1.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Keywords: checkin-needed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 3.2a1
| Assignee | ||
Comment 16•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 364728 [details] [diff] [review]
Simple one-liner. (checked in)
Not sure if this is wanted on 1.9.1 or not, but this probably has to wait anyhow until after the beta...
Attachment #364728 -
Flags: approval1.9.1?
Comment 17•16 years ago
|
||
What?
Where in this bug is the rationale to not change the entity name?
Please back this out and get a real patch in.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 18•16 years ago
|
||
I changed the entity name: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/af782d5ec362
I don't think getting this into 1.9.1 is worth the trouble.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago → 16 years ago
Hardware: x86 → All
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Version: unspecified → Trunk
Comment 19•16 years ago
|
||
Axel, would getting the string change but not the entitiy change on 1.9.1 cause any problems?
Comment 20•16 years ago
|
||
Yes, 1.9.1 is string frozen.
Comment 21•16 years ago
|
||
That's no proper explanation, as the string freeze isn't an end in itself. If the entity name isn't changed on 1.9.1, what kind of problems does this cause?
I don't want to force this bug to get fixed for 1.9.1, but I'd like to understand that policy.
Comment 22•16 years ago
|
||
The policy is dead simple. No l10n changes unless it's a blocker.
Comment 23•16 years ago
|
||
Would it affect other locales as a "l10n change"? Would changing the wording in a German string be considered a l10n change by that policy?
Comment 24•16 years ago
|
||
This discussion has absolutely nothing to do with this bug, thus I'm ending it here. If you have specific questions about string freeze, ask in the newsgroups.
Comment 25•16 years ago
|
||
Erm, you can leave, but that doesn't end the discussion for me, and I don't care enough to start another discussion elsewhere. My question here was why the change from this very bug would be considered a l10n change. If there's no simple answer to this, I suspect the policy needs to be fixed, and if there's no answer at all, I suppose this can in fact land on 1.9.1.
Comment 26•16 years ago
|
||
Why don't you provide rationale to prove your own comment 8 wrong instead?
Just because Gavin reviewed a bad patch doesn't make this a non-l10n-impact patch.
Comment 27•16 years ago
|
||
I don't think there's anything wrong with comment 8. It refers to a patch that introduced a new entity and would thus have had l10n impact. Attachment 364728 [details] [diff] doesn't change the entity name, which is arguably wrong for trunk, but shouldn't have a bad impact on branch, as far as I understand things.
| Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #364728 -
Flags: approval1.9.1?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 28•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 364728 [details] [diff] [review]
Simple one-liner. (checked in)
Removing the approval request for now...
fwiw I thought semantic changes to strings (when they didn't really change the meaning) didn't require an entity change, which is why I didn't change it.
Thanks Gavin for fixing that for me.
Comment 29•16 years ago
|
||
This is bad from a user support point of view. Imagine that the Advanced tab is selected, and you are asked to click the "General" tab. Which one should you click? It is ambiguous. Please don't add two buttons/tabs next to each other with the same name and no easy way of telling which is which. We currently have this problem in the Danish version of Thunderbird, and it is rather annoying.
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: user-doc-needed
Comment 30•16 years ago
|
||
Requesting blocking and late-l10n because of comment 29 and comment 22.
Flags: blocking-firefox3.5?
Keywords: late-l10n
Comment 31•16 years ago
|
||
Litmus test cases will have to be updated because of this change, nominating for in litmus.
Flags: in-litmus?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 32•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #30)
> Requesting blocking and late-l10n because of comment 29 and comment 22.
Comment 29 _does not_ want this change, are you requesting blocking to remove this change? If so, the change never landed in 3.1/3.5 and there wouldn't be any late-l10n changes? Am I misunderstanding something?
Comment 33•16 years ago
|
||
This doesn't block, and in fact, feels like an incomplete fix that makes a not-horrible situation no more or less horrible.
The correct solution is to actually rethink the preferences panel and determine:
- should these prefs be in the "Main"/"General" section, or elsewhere?
- what we should rename "Advanced:General" to in order to avoid confusion
In either case, we can wait for another version, and I'd rather not cause the headache for SUMO and others this late in the game here until we've got a more thoroughly thought through solution.
Flags: blocking-firefox3.6?
Flags: blocking-firefox3.5?
Flags: blocking-firefox3.5-
Comment 34•16 years ago
|
||
Adding uiwanted to put this on my radar for fixing the advanced > general problem.
Keywords: uiwanted
Updated•16 years ago
|
Target Milestone: Firefox 3.2a1 → Future
Comment 35•16 years ago
|
||
Seems like people want this bug to stay open.
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #364728 -
Attachment description: Simple one-liner. → Simple one-liner. (checked in)
Updated•16 years ago
|
Status: REOPENED → NEW
| Assignee | ||
Comment 36•16 years ago
|
||
This bug was reopened but the fix is still in m-c, should it be backed out?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 37•16 years ago
|
||
Oh, and the page info dialog uses the term General as well, not sure if that should affect this in any way...
Comment 38•16 years ago
|
||
>This bug was reopened but the fix is still in m-c, should it be backed out?
Yeah, let's back it out and later make multiple updates to terminology at the same time to solve the problems beltzner points out.
| Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: user-doc-needed
Whiteboard: [polish-easy] [polish-visual] → [polish-easy] [polish-visual] [needs backout]
| Assignee | ||
Comment 39•16 years ago
|
||
Here's the backout patch, not sure if I have to find a new (third) entity name, not change the entity name at all, or if this is fine (reverting back to the old entity name).
Attachment #364728 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
| Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Whiteboard: [polish-easy] [polish-visual] [needs backout] → [polish-easy] [polish-visual] [needs backout][c-n: backout patch]
Comment 40•16 years ago
|
||
This bug's priority relative to the set of other polish bugs is:
P3 - Polish issue that is in a secondary interface, occasionally encountered, or is not easily identifiable.
I'm assuming that OS X users will focus more on the icon than the name, even though the name is technically incorrect in terms of external consistency.
Whiteboard: [polish-easy] [polish-visual] [needs backout][c-n: backout patch] → [polish-easy] [polish-visual] [needs backout][c-n: backout patch][polish-p3]
| Assignee | ||
Comment 41•16 years ago
|
||
Probably too late to really do a backout, looking forward to a ui decision on how to do this...
Keywords: checkin-needed
Whiteboard: [polish-easy] [polish-visual] [needs backout][c-n: backout patch][polish-p3] → [polish-easy] [polish-visual] [polish-p3]
Comment 42•16 years ago
|
||
This needs to be wrapped up quickly, since 3.6 has a very small development window.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 43•16 years ago
|
||
Being that this landed, and it isn't reasonable anymore to back this out, I'm resolving this as fixed. I'll spin out a new bug with the issues in comment 33.
One of the main reasons to close this out is to at least get this in litmus, maybe even get a user-doc for it as well.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago → 16 years ago
Flags: blocking-firefox3.6?
Keywords: uiwanted → user-doc-needed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
| Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Target Milestone: Future → Firefox 3.6a1
Comment 44•16 years ago
|
||
user-doc-complete
Articles updated:
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Downloads+window
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Downloads+window+does+not+open
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Firefox+does+not+ask+to+save+tabs+and+windows+on+exit
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Firefox+has+just+updated+tab+shows+each+time+you+start+Firefox
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/How+to+set+the+home+page
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Options+window
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Options+window+-+Applications+panel
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Options+window+-+General+panel
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Options+window+-+Privacy+panel
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Session+Restore
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Tabbed+browsing
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Unable+to+download+or+save+files
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Firefox+Hangs
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Firefox+makes+unrequested+connections
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Multiple+tabs+open+when+starting+Firefox
Keywords: user-doc-needed → user-doc-complete
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•