Closed
Bug 474257
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
SVG SMIL: Update beginElement & co. to return void
Categories
(Core :: SVG, defect)
Core
SVG
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: birtles, Assigned: birtles)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
12.73 KB,
patch
|
roc
:
review+
roc
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
The specifications for the DOM TimeElementControl interface differ between SVG and SMIL Animation. This discrepancy has been addressed in an erratum to SVG 1.1
http://www.w3.org/2003/01/REC-SVG11-20030114-errata#elementtimecontrol-interface
However, some of how code has not been migrated from the old signature (with a boolean return type) to the new (with a void return type). We need to bring this all up to date.
Furthermore, we have a mochitest (test_smilRestart.xhtml) that is failing because it relies on this boolean return type that we no longer offer.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
Patch to address these issues
Attachment #357607 -
Flags: superreview?(roc)
Attachment #357607 -
Flags: review?(roc)
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
Note, this patch applies on top of the patch for bug 473702 (implement SVGAnimationElement interface) because we need that interface in the updated mochitest now that we can't use the return value of BeginElement and co.
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•16 years ago
|
||
Fixed return types in nsSMILTimedElement.cpp (thanks Robert!)
Attachment #357607 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #357610 -
Flags: superreview?(roc)
Attachment #357610 -
Flags: review?(roc)
Attachment #357607 -
Flags: superreview?(roc)
Attachment #357607 -
Flags: review?(roc)
Attachment #357610 -
Flags: superreview?(roc)
Attachment #357610 -
Flags: superreview+
Attachment #357610 -
Flags: review?(roc)
Attachment #357610 -
Flags: review+
Keywords: checkin-needed
Whiteboard: [needs landing]
Pushed d9bbceb06cdc
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Keywords: checkin-needed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [needs landing]
Flags: in-testsuite+
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: dev-doc-needed
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [doc-waiting-1.9.3]
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
Given that we currently don't explicitly document SVG at all, I'm removing the doc needed keyword from this in favor of bug 602022, which covers writing a complete set of SVG documentation.
Keywords: dev-doc-needed
Whiteboard: [doc-waiting-1.9.3]
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•